PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 10, 2026Water Resources Research0 citationsOpen Access

Impacts of Spatial Resolution, Groundwater Parameterizations, and Vadose Zone Thickness on Land Surface Simulations

View Full Paper
MMMahmoud MbarakZYZong‐Liang Yang

Key Points

  • This study aims to explore how different groundwater parameterizations, spatial resolutions, and vadose zone thickness affect simulated land surface processes.
  • Utilized the Noah-MP land surface model to simulate soil moisture, evapotranspiration, and ground temperature.
  • Compared simulation outcomes across various spatial resolutions (2m, 4m, 8m) and groundwater schemes.
  • Analyzed the impact of vadose zone thickness on modeling accuracy and temperature biases.
  • Increased spatial resolution reduced simulated median temperatures by 0.5 K.
  • The groundwater scheme enhanced soil moisture and transpiration, leading to cooling effects of up to 1.5 K in the central midlatitudes from 2017 to 2019.
  • Variations in vadose zone thickness showed non-linear impacts on temperature, significantly influenced by water table depth and land cover.

Abstract

Abstract Accurate kilometer‐scale modeling of land processes is crucial for improving weather and climate forecasting. However, persistent biases, such as the well‐documented warm temperature and dry bias in the central midlatitudes, continue to pose challenges. This study investigates the impacts of groundwater schemes, spatial resolution, and vadose zone thickness on simulated soil moisture, evapotranspiration, and ground temperature using the Noah‐MP land surface model. We find that increasing spatial resolution reduces simulated median temperatures by 0.5 K over our domain of study. The groundwater scheme consistently increases soil moisture, evaporation, and transpiration, especially in wet, vegetated areas, resulting in cooling effects up to 1.5 K in the central midlatitudes from 2017 to 2019. The impact of vadose zone thickness is non‐linear, and largely dependent on water table depth, and land cover categories, with the 8‐m run showing higher magnitude changes compared to the 2‐m run, while the 4‐m run exhibits smaller changes. These findings underscore the critical role of spatial resolution, groundwater dynamics and vadose zone thickness in land surface models.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mbarak et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a28fff36f82f25be989cae0https://doi.org/10.1029/2025wr040135
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper