PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 14, 2025Scientific Reports4 citationsOpen Access

Comparison of left ventricular hemodynamic forces measured by transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in healthy adults

AZAizhan ZhankorazovaGTGiovanni TontiZKZaukiya Khamitova

Key Result

Transthoracic echocardiography significantly underestimated longitudinal left ventricular hemodynamic forces compared to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging by a mean difference of 13.64%.

Study Design

Type

Cross-Sectional (n=20)

Blinding

Single-blind

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does transthoracic echocardiography yield comparable left ventricular hemodynamic force measurements to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in healthy adults?

P
Population
20 healthy adult volunteers of Kazakh ethnicity, median age 31 years, underwent both cine-CMR and 2D-TTE within 7 days to compare left ventricular hemodynamic forces.
E
Exposure
Transthoracic echocardiography (2D-TTE)
C
Comparator
Cardiac magnetic resonance (cine-CMR) imaging performed within 7 days
O
Outcome
Left ventricular hemodynamic forces (HDF) parameters including longitudinal (A-B) and transverse (L-S) HDFsurrogate

Transthoracic echocardiography systematically underestimates left ventricular hemodynamic forces compared to cardiac magnetic resonance, indicating the two modalities cannot be used interchangeably for serial assessments.

Main Result

Mean Difference: 13.64 (95% CI 10.78–16.49)

Absolute Event Rate: 12.4% vs 26.1%

p-value: p=<0.001

Limitations

  • Small sample size of 20 subjects
  • Limited to young normal volunteers of a specific ethnic group, reducing generalizability
  • Results obtained with TTE are related to the specific ultrasound equipment used
  • Small sample size
  • Limited to young normal volunteers, which may amplify inter-individual variability and reduce generalizability
  • Results may be specific to the ultrasound equipment used

Abstract

Hemodynamic forces (HDF), which reflect the forces exchanged between blood and cardiac tissues, can be derived from cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) or transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). Although normal values are reported for each imaging technique, no study has compared HDF values within the same cohort so far. We aimed to compare left ventricular (LV) HDF parameters obtained from CMR and TTE in healthy subjects. Twenty volunteers underwent both cine-CMR and 2D-TTE (within 7 days) at the Heart Center University Medical Center in Astana, Kazakhstan. Images were analyzed offline using dedicated software to extract standard volumetric, functional, strain, and HDF parameters: longitudinal (A-B) and transverse (L-S) HDF, L-S/A-B HDF ratio, and HDF vector angle. Statistical comparisons were performed with significance set at p < 0.05; Bland-Altman plots assessed agreement. TTE significantly underestimated LV volumes, ejection fraction, and global longitudinal strain compared to CMR. Similarly, HDF values were lower with TTE for both longitudinal and transverse forces (A-B HDF: 12.4 ± 3.4 vs. 26.1 ± 6.6; L-S HDF: 2.6 ± 1.2 vs. 5.2 ± 1.4; both p < 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis confirmed systematic underestimation of HDF by TTE. These findings suggest that TTE and CMR cannot be used interchangeably for HDF assessment, particularly in serial studies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhankorazova et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy adults (n=20). Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) vs. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) was evaluated on Longitudinal (A-B) hemodynamic forces (%) (MD 13.64%, 95% CI 10.78-16.49, p=<0.001). Transthoracic echocardiography significantly underestimated longitudinal left ventricular hemodynamic forces compared to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging by a mean difference of 13.64%.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2924fbd6d35f58f4252caehttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-13966-5
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper