PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 1, 1994European Heart Journal52 citations

Determination of left ventricular volume by two-dimensional echocardiography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging

View Full Paper
MHMarie‐Christine HerregodsGPG. De PaepBBB. BUNENS

Key Result

Two-dimensional echocardiography accurately determined left ventricular volume, showing no statistical difference compared to MRI for end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, or ejection fraction.

Key Points

  • This research aims to compare left ventricular volume measurements obtained from two-dimensional echocardiography with magnetic resonance imaging.
  • Measured left ventricular volume in 12 healthy volunteers using a two-dimensional echocardiographic method and magnetic resonance imaging as a reference.
  • Analyzed left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes, and ejection fraction.
  • Assessed interstudy and inter-observer variability.
  • Left ventricular end-diastolic volume: echocardiography 123 +/- 12 ml vs MRI 121 +/- 12 ml (no significant difference).
  • End-systolic volume: echocardiography 41 +/- 7 ml vs MRI 37 +/- 6 ml (no significant difference).
  • Ejection fraction: echocardiography 67 +/- 4% vs MRI 70 +/- 5% (no significant difference).

Study Design

Type

Cross-Sectional (n=12)

Structured PICO

Does a newly developed two-dimensional echocardiographic delineation method accurately determine left ventricular volume compared to MRI in healthy volunteers?

P
Population
12 healthy volunteers evaluated for left ventricular volume using a newly developed two-dimensional echocardiographic method compared to magnetic resonance imaging.
E
Exposure
Newly developed two-dimensional echocardiographic delineation method
C
Comparator
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
O
Outcome
Left ventricular volume (end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, and ejection fraction)surrogate

A newly developed two-dimensional echocardiographic delineation method accurately determines left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction compared to MRI in healthy volunteers.

Abstract

Left ventricular volume was determined in 12 healthy volunteers using a newly developed two-dimensional echocardiographic delineation method. The results were compared with those of magnetic resonance imaging, which served as the method of reference. Left ventricular end-diastolic volume was 123 +/- 12 ml, echocardiographically defined, and 121 +/- 12 ml calculated with magnetic resonance imaging. End-systolic volume was 41 +/- 7 ml on echocardiography and 37 +/- 6 ml on magnetic resonance imaging. Left ventricular ejection fraction was 67 +/- 4%, echocardiographically defined, and 70 +/- 5%, calculated with magnetic resonance imaging. There was no statistical difference for any of the measured parameters. Interstudy and inter-observer variability was minimal. In conclusion, in healthy volunteers left ventricular volume was accurately defined, using this newly developed two-dimensional echocardiographic delineation method. During endocardial delineation a dynamic display is continuously available on a second window, allowing precise visual edge-detection. Moreover, corrections can be made easily and quickly. These two advantages enhance the accuracy of the method, even in cases of poor echogenicity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Herregods et al. (1994) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy (n=12). Two-dimensional echocardiographic delineation method vs. Magnetic resonance imaging was evaluated on Left ventricular volume (end-diastolic and end-systolic) and ejection fraction. Two-dimensional echocardiography accurately determined left ventricular volume, showing no statistical difference compared to MRI for end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, or ejection fraction.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2924fdd6d35f58f4252cb3https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a060630
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper