PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 14, 2014Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention36 citations

Effectiveness of a Pedometer-Based Telephone Coaching Program on Weight and Physical Activity for People Referred to a Cardiac Rehabilitation Program

View Full Paper
JSJanice SangsterSFSusan FurberMAMargaret Allman‐Farinelli

Key Result

A healthy weight telephone coaching program decreased weight compared to a physical activity program (P=0.005), with a 1.6 kg vs 0.4 kg mean weight loss in participants with BMI ≥25 (P=0.015).

Study Design

Type

RCT (n=313)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does a pedometer-based telephone coaching program improve weight and physical activity in patients referred to cardiac rehabilitation?

P
Population
313 patients referred to cardiac rehabilitation in rural and urban Australia, followed for 6-8 months.
I
Intervention
Healthy weight (HW) intervention consisting of 4 pedometer-based telephone coaching sessions on weight and physical activity
C
Comparator
Physical activity (PA) intervention consisting of 2 pedometer-based telephone coaching sessions on physical activity
O
Outcome
Weight and physical activity assessed by self-report at short-term (6-8 weeks) and medium-term (6-8 months)patient reported

A low-contact, pedometer-based telephone coaching program provides modest weight loss and physical activity improvements for patients referred to cardiac rehabilitation, offering a feasible adjunct or alternative for underserved populations.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 1.6% vs 0.4%

p-value: p=.015

Abstract

In Brief PURPOSE: To determine the effectiveness of a pedometer-based telephone lifestyle coaching intervention on weight and physical activity. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 313 patients referred to cardiac rehabilitation in rural and urban Australia. Participants were allocated to a healthy weight (HW) (4 telephone coaching sessions on weight and physical activity) or a physical activity (PA) intervention (2 telephone coaching sessions on physical activity). Weight and physical activity were assessed by self-report at baseline, short-term (6-8 weeks), and medium-term (6-8 months). RESULTS: More than 90% of participants completed the trial. Over the medium-term, participants in the HW group decreased their weight compared with participants in the PA group (P = .005). Participants in the HW group with a body mass index of ≥25 kg/m2 had a mean weight loss of 1.6 kg compared with participants in the PA-only group who lost a mean of 0.4 kg (P = .015). Short-term, both groups increased their physical activity time, and the PA group maintained this increase at the medium-term. CONCLUSIONS: Participants in the HW group achieved modest improvements in weight, and those in the PA group demonstrated increased physical activity. Low-contact, telephone-based interventions are a feasible means of delivering lifestyle interventions for underserved rural communities, for those not attending cardiac rehabilitation, or as an adjunct to cardiac rehabilitation. A randomized controlled trial was conducted to determine the effectiveness of a pedometer-based telephone coaching intervention, on weight and physical activity, for urban and rural patients referred to cardiac rehabilitation. Healthy weight patients achieved modest improvements in weight, and the physical activity group demonstrated increased physical activity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sangster et al. (2014) conducted an RCT in Referred to cardiac rehabilitation (n=313). Healthy weight (HW) pedometer-based telephone coaching program vs. Physical activity (PA) intervention (2 telephone coaching sessions on physical activity) was evaluated on Mean weight loss in participants with BMI ≥25 kg/m2 (p=.015). A healthy weight telephone coaching program decreased weight compared to a physical activity program (P=0.005), with a 1.6 kg vs 0.4 kg mean weight loss in participants with BMI ≥25 (P=0.015).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2a507ca94d6bc7baa23490https://doi.org/10.1097/hcr.0000000000000082
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper