PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 11, 2026International Journal of Developmental Disabilities0 citationsOpen Access

A qualitative exploration of engagement in daily activity programs among adults with mild intellectual disability and severe challenging behaviors in a residential care setting

View Full Paper
ATA. TurhanNPNienke Peters‐SchefferMDMonique Delforterie

Key Points

  • This study aims to explore how adults with mild intellectual disabilities engage in daily activities and identify factors influencing this engagement.
  • Conducted semi-structured interviews with seven residents and five staff members.
  • Used framework analysis to identify barriers and facilitators to engagement in daily activities.
  • Guided by the Inpatient Daily Activities Inventory (IDAI) for coding and theme development.
  • Residents and staff identified benefits of structured routines, social interaction, and autonomy in activities.
  • Barriers included disruptive peer interactions, interruptions to routine, and social stigma impacting engagement.
  • Inadequate staff coordination was a significant factor affecting the implementation of activities.

Abstract

Objectives This qualitative study explored engagement in daily activities among adults with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning and severe challenging behaviors in a Dutch residential care setting.Methods Semi-structured interviews with seven residents and five staff members were analyzed using framework analysis to identify barriers and facilitators to engagement. The Inpatient Daily Activities Inventory (IDAI) informed the interviews, and its five dimensions (Structure, Contact and Support, Recovery, Learning and Meaning, and Autonomy) guided the a priori coding framework while allowing additional themes to emerge.Results Residents’ and staff accounts reflected all five IDAI dimensions, including benefits of daily routine, social interaction, learning opportunities, and autonomy. Barriers included disruptive peer interactions, interruptions to routine, activities not perceived as real work, and social stigma. Inadequate staff coordination emerged as an overarching service-level factor affecting engagement.Conclusion These findings indicate the need for individualized activity programs embedded within coordinated service delivery across residential and work settings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Turhan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2a526080c8f91e7f39e5abhttps://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2026.2683484
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper