PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 11, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Triadic Mesh Dynamics: Physical Limits of Computability, Invertibility, and Cryptographic Security

View Full Paper
AKAleš Kováč

Key Points

  • The study aims to explore how Triadic Mesh Dynamics (TMD) defines computability and cryptographic security as physical properties in space.
  • Developed a unified framework showcasing fundamental phenomena in mathematics, cryptography, and information theory.
  • Analyzed the triadic operator and its role in defining one-wayness and computability limits.
  • Investigated geometric configurations in a 9-dimensional configuration space.
  • Physical one-wayness indicates non-unitary evolution in triadic networks.
  • Identified the spectral horizon as a limit of algorithmic reconstructability.
  • Proposed new cryptographic primitives based on geometric configurations with physically impossible inversion.

Abstract

Triadic Mesh Dynamics (TMD) is an ontological model of space in which information is a physical quantity and computability is determined directly by the properties of the triadic operator. This work presents a unified framework showing that TMD naturally generates three fundamental phenomena relevant to mathematics, cryptography, and information theory: Physical one‑wayness arising from the non‑unitary evolution of the triadic network and the presence of a forget step. The spectral horizon, representing an absolute physical limit of algorithmic reconstructability. The Riemann boundary of computability, providing a physical interpretation of the critical line Re(s) = 1/2 as the boundary of operator invertibility. These results demonstrate that security, complexity, and computability are not abstract mathematical constructs but physical properties of space itself. TMD thus offers a new class of cryptographic primitives based on geometric configurations in a 9‑dimensional configuration space, whose inversion is physically impossible rather than computationally expensive.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Aleš Kováč (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2a526080c8f91e7f39e5d9https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20605629
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper