PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 12, 2026Atmosphere0 citationsOpen Access

Multi-Method Explainable AI Framework for Quantifying Traffic and Meteorological Contributions to Urban Air Pollution: A Case Study of Istanbul’s Bosphorus Bridge Corridor

View Full Paper
EBEnes BirinciHÖHüseyin ÖzdemirADAli Deniz

Key Points

  • This research aims to quantify the contributions of traffic and meteorological conditions to urban air pollution in Istanbul.
  • An integrated framework combining multiple explainable AI (XAI) techniques and causal inference was developed.
  • Five machine learning models were trained with hourly data (2022–2023) including XGBoost and CatBoost.
  • SHAP, LIME, PDP, and ALE were utilized for interpretability, while temporal decomposition and causal testing were performed.
  • Tree-based models achieved R2 > 0.80 for all pollutants, with CatBoost reaching PM2.5 R2 = 0.876.
  • Wind speed significantly negatively affected NOX levels, while traffic accounted for approximately 20% of NOX contributions.
  • Causal analysis revealed wind speed was the strongest causal driver of NOX (ρ = 0.37) and confirmed traffic's direct link to NOX.

Abstract

Urban air pollution results from complex interactions between vehicle emissions, meteorological conditions, and atmospheric chemistry. While machine learning models achieve high accuracy in air quality prediction, their limited transparency hinders policy adoption. We present an integrated (M-ETAQI) framework combining multiple XAI techniques, temporal decomposition, and causal inference to quantify traffic and meteorological contributions to PM10, PM2.5, NOX, and NO2 concentrations in the Istanbul FSM Bridge corridor (2022–2023 hourly data). Five machine learning models, including XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost, Random Forest, and CNN–LSTM–Attention, were trained with temporal cross-validation. SHAP, LIME, PDP, and ALE were applied for interpretability; STL decomposition isolated temporal components, and CCM tested causal links. Tree-based models achieved R2 > 0.80 for all pollutants, with CatBoost reaching PM2.5 R2 = 0.876. SHAP confirmed Lag1 as the dominant feature. Wind speed had a significant negative effect on NOX, while traffic contributed ~20% to NOX, twice that of other pollutants. STL showed the trend component dominated total variance; NO2 trend variance = 56.3%. CCM revealed wind speed as the strongest causal driver of NOX (ρ = 0.37) and confirmed direct traffic–NOX links. Knowledge distillation from CatBoost improved CNN–LSTM–Attention performance. The four XAI methods yielded consistent attributions, providing robust, cross-validated evidence for traffic management and air-quality policy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Birinci et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2ba2448101cf8926f0145bhttps://doi.org/10.3390/atmos17060591
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper