PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 12, 2026Clinical Otolaryngology0 citationsOpen Access

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol in Transoral Robotic Surgery: A Case–Control Study

View Full Paper
JDJonathan DanielRSRaguwinder Bindy SahotaMWMark D. Wilkie

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate the impact of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol on various outcomes in patients undergoing Transoral Robotic Surgery (TORS).
  • Conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing outcomes before and after ERAS protocol implementation in TORS.
  • Included key features such as pharyngocutaneous risk stratification and thorough perioperative assessments.
  • Analyzed data for 40 TORS cases.
  • Patients following the ERAS protocol showed a significant reduction in median length of stay by 3.5 days (p = 0.03).
  • The adherence rate to the ERAS protocol was 90% in the w-ERAS group.
  • Trends suggested reduced median cost per patient and faster return to oral intake.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: 'Enhanced Recovery After Surgery' (ERAS) protocols have been developed for multiple surgical procedures with favourable outcome measures including Length of Stay (LoS). Trans-Oral Robotic Surgery (TORS) has similarly facilitated earlier patient discharges, particularly in comparison to open head and neck surgical techniques. There is a dearth of literature on the effect of ERAS protocols in TORS. We sought to comprehensively examine the effect of a TORS ERAS protocol across several key metrics, with a focus on LoS. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study following implementation of a TORS ERAS protocol. This protocol was developed at our institution and implemented in 2021; it included key features such as pharyngocutaneous risk stratification and thorough perioperative assessments. Patients managed prior to (p-ERAS) and post implementation (w-ERAS) were separated into two groups, with key outcomes, including LoS, estimated cost per patient, return to swallow, and complication rate, compared. RESULTS: A total of 40 TORS cases were included. Patients managed w-ERAS had a mean adherence rate to protocol of 90%. The w-ERAS group showed a statistically significant reduction in median length of stay by 3.5 days (p = 0.03) when compared to the p-ERAS group. There was also a trend towards decreased median cost per patient as well as decreased median time to oral intake. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates an easily implementable protocol for the perioperative management of TORS oncological surgery. The use of this ERAS protocol demonstrated a significant reduction in patient length of stay in a small sample size.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Daniel et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2ba2448101cf8926f0152ahttps://doi.org/10.1111/coa.70126
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Enhanced Recovery After Surgery2017 · 3,553 citations
  2. 2Comparison of Survival After Transoral Robotic Surgery vs Nonrobotic Surgery in Patients With Early-Stage Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma2020 · 83 citations
  3. 3Guidelines for Perioperative Care for Pancreatoduodenectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Recommendations 20192020 · 536 citations
  4. 4Functional Swallowing Outcomes Following Transoral Robotic Surgery vs Primary Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Advanced-Stage Oropharynx and Supraglottis Cancers2013 · 158 citations
  5. 5A systematic review on the efficacy of tranexamic acid in head and neck surgery2023 · 10 citations