PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 12, 2026Religion Compass0 citationsOpen Access

Chinese Utopianism: A Historical Overview

View Full Paper
OTOri Tavor

Key Points

  • This work aims to explore the historical development of Chinese utopianism and its broader significance in utopian studies.
  • Adopting a historical framework to analyze four key junctures in Chinese utopianism's evolution.
  • Identifying philosophical, millenarian, and transformative projects across different historical periods.
  • Proposing a typology of major and minor utopias for a nuanced understanding of their expressions.
  • Identified four key junctures: classical philosophical, millenarian, late Qing to early Communist interactions, and post-Mao expressions.
  • Demonstrated that Chinese intellectual traditions encompass both major transformative and minor localized utopias.
  • Proposed a theoretical intervention that transcends traditional sectarian frameworks of Confucian, Daoist, and Buddhist utopias.

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article surveys the historical development of Chinese utopianism and its relationship to broader debates in the field of utopian studies. While early scholarship often dismissed utopianism as a uniquely Western tradition, subsequent research has demonstrated that discourses related to the creation of an ideal society occupied a central role in Chinese intellectual, religious, and literary history. Adopting a historical framework, this study identifies four key junctures in the evolution of Chinese utopianism: (1) the emergence of classical philosophical utopianism during the Warring States and Early Imperial periods; (2) the rise of millenarian utopianism in Daoist and Buddhist traditions; (3) the dynamic encounter between the Chinese tradition and Western models of anarchic, socialist, and radical utopias in the late Qing, Republican, and early Communist eras; and (4) the diverse utopian expressions of the post‐Mao Reform Era, including dystopian literature, eco‐villages, revived Confucian projects, and new cosmopolitan theories of world order. In addition to tracing this longue durée trajectory, the article offers a theoretical intervention that moves beyond the conventional sectarian framework of Confucian, Daoist, and Buddhist utopias. Instead, it proposes a typology of “major” and “minor” utopias, distinguishing between large‐scale, transformative projects and smaller, localized experiments.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ori Tavor (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2ba2c18101cf8926f019f1https://doi.org/10.1111/rec3.70056
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper