PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 12, 2026Journal of Agrarian Change0 citations

Peasant Movements and the Fourth Transformation in Mexico: What Does the Theory of Collective Empowerment Tell Us?

View Full Paper
GOGerardo Otero

Key Points

  • The aim is to analyze how peasant and Indigenous movements in Mexico relate to state intervention and collective empowerment theory.
  • Comparative analysis of the EZLN, MPASXXI, and other movements.
  • Assessment of income distribution advancements post-2018.
  • Examination of government’s organizational disintermediation model.
  • Identified structural ambivalence in state intervention reducing clientelism but weakening collective organization.
  • Three determinants of collective empowerment were articulated: organizational autonomy, democratizing state interaction, and structural incidence.
  • Concluded that durable societal transformation relies on dynamic interaction of these determinants.

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article examines peasant and Indigenous movements in Mexico since Morena's rise to power in 2018 through the lens of collective empowerment theory, a theory of political‐cultural formation. Beyond offering an empirical assessment, the theory is refined and formalized through an analysis of these movements and their relationship to progressive state intervention. Starting from the recognition of empirically verifiable advances in income distribution, the article examines whether these state‐level achievements have been accompanied by a strengthening of organized collective subjects. Through a comparative analysis of the Zapatista National Liberation Army (EZLN), Movimiento Plan de Ayala Siglo XXI (MPASXXI) and other movements, the article shows that the government's organizational disintermediation model produces a structural ambivalence: It may reduce clientelist practices while simultaneously weakening collective organizational capacity. The article concludes by identifying three interrelated determinants of transformative collective empowerment—organizational autonomy, democratizing interaction with the state and popular‐democratic structural incidence. It argues that durable popular‐democratic societal transformation depends on their dynamic articulation in Mexico and beyond.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gerardo Otero (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2ba3a28101cf8926f024f1https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.70099
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Southern Voice: Zapatista and the Challenge towards Neoliberal Agenda in a Globalized World2025
  2. 2Continual Curse or Potential Cure? Collective Criminal Governance Resistance Movements and Their Democratic Implications in Mexico2026
  3. 3Networked alternatives against the state: zapatista autonomy and informality as resistance2025
  4. 4Creating New Spaces: Autonomous Practice in Zapatista Communities2024
  5. 5Pink Tide or Pink Mirage? Civil Society Networks and Democratic Mobilization in Mexico's 2024 Presidential Elections2026