PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 13, 2026Neurology0 citations

Human Models in Mechanical Thrombectomy: A Comparative Review of Cadaveric, Perfused, and Ex Vivo Platforms (P3-4.004)

View Full Paper
NHNaser HamadUniversity of MiamiADAbdullah DurraniFlorida International UniversityCJCian JacobFlorida International University

Key Points

  • To evaluate the strengths and limitations of various human-based thrombectomy models for preclinical applications.
  • Systematic review of static cadaveric, perfused cadaveric, and ex vivo vascular tissue models.
  • Comparative analysis of the advantages and drawbacks of each thrombectomy model.
  • Framework development for their role in preclinical studies.
  • Identified cadaveric models offer realistic anatomical configurations but have limited flow dynamics.
  • Perfused cadaveric models simulate blood flow better but may have tissue viability issues.
  • Ex vivo platforms provide a balance of high fidelity and accessibility, enabling diverse applications.

Abstract

This review systematically evaluates the strengths, limitations, and applications of all major human-based thrombectomy models, static cadaveric, perfused cadaveric, and ex vivo vascular tissues, in order to provide a comparative framework for their role in preclinical development.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hamad et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2cf393faef96ed7f0560c4https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000215429
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper