PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 13, 2026Systems0 citationsOpen Access

Balancing Cost and Service Performance: A Multi Objective Inventory Planning Approach for Multi Echelon Supply Chains

View Full Paper
JVJoaquim Jorge Vicente

Key Points

  • The aim is to analyze the trade-off between operational costs and customer service levels in multi echelon inventory systems.
  • Developed a decision-support framework for multi echelon inventory systems.
  • Integrated fixed-order-quantity replenishment policies and lead-time dynamics.
  • Generated a Pareto frontier to identify efficient solutions.
  • Increasing service level from 46% to 96% raises total cost by approximately 19%.
  • Achieving full demand satisfaction necessitates an additional 5% cost increase for marginal service improvement.
  • Identified a cost–service turning point at 96% service level, with diminishing returns beyond.

Abstract

This paper presents a decision-support framework for analysing the trade-off between total operational cost and customer service level in multi echelon inventory systems. The model integrates fixed-order-quantity replenishment policies, lead-time dynamics and multi objective optimisation to generate a detailed Pareto frontier of efficient solutions. A real multi echelon distribution network is used to demonstrate the model’s applicability and managerial relevance. The results indicate that raising the service level from 46% to the sector standard of 96% increases total cost by approximately 19%, while achieving full demand satisfaction requires an additional 5% cost increase for only marginal service improvement. This pattern reveals a clear cost–service turning point around the 96% service level, beyond which additional gains exhibit sharply diminishing returns. The framework, therefore, provides a transparent and analytical mechanism for identifying replenishment strategies that balance cost efficiency with service performance. By decomposing total cost into ordering, holding, transport and lost-sales components, the model enhances managerial visibility and supports targeted policy adjustments. The paper also discusses limitations of the current formulation and outlines avenues for future research, including alternative replenishment policies, multi-product extensions and richer uncertainty modelling.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Joaquim Jorge Vicente (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2cf665faef96ed7f0582cdhttps://doi.org/10.3390/systems14060664
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A Bi-Objective Model for the Multi-Period Inventory-Based Reverse Logistics Network: A Case Study from an Automobile Component Distribution Network2024 · 2 citations
  2. 2Dynamic Optimization of Multi-Echelon Supply Chain Inventory Policies Under Disruptive Scenarios: A Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach2025 · 2 citations
  3. 3Optimizing Supply Chain Inventory: A Mixed Integer Linear Programming Approach2025 · 9 citations
  4. 4A real-time inventory model to manage variance of demand for decreasing inventory holding cost2016 · 22 citations
  5. 5A fuzzy multiobjective linear programming approach for green multiechelon distribution network design2023 · 8 citations