PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 13, 2026Neuro-Oncology Practice0 citations

Efficacy of Vorasidenib for Patients with IDH-Mutant Glioma Previously Treated with Ivosidenib

View Full Paper
SSSydney E SchultzJBJason N. BarretoCMCarolyn Mead-Harvey

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of vorasidenib in patients with IDH-mutant gliomas previously treated with ivosidenib.
  • Retrospective review of patients with IDH-mutant glioma treated with vorasidenib after ivosidenib.
  • Collected data included previous treatments, radiographic responses, and adverse events.
  • Analyzed treatment outcomes descriptively.
  • 63% of patients with disease progression on ivosidenib achieved stable disease on vorasidenib.
  • 11 patients who were stable on ivosidenib remained without progression on vorasidenib.
  • Patients who transitioned due to adverse effects experienced symptom resolution and maintained disease stability.

Abstract

Abstract Background Isocitrate dehydrogenase-1 (IDH-1) inhibitor ivosidenib and dual-IDH1/2 inhibitor vorasidenib have demonstrated clinical activity in treatment of IDH-mutant gliomas. We evaluated efficacy of vorasidenib in patients with prior exposure to ivosidenib. Methods Retrospective review of patients with IDH-mutant glioma treated with vorasidenib who had prior treatment with ivosidenib. Previous treatments, radiographic response, and adverse events were collected and analyzed descriptively. Results Twenty-nine patients (median age 42, 34% female) were evaluated. Tumor types included IDH-mutant astrocytoma (grade 2 n = 9, 31%; grade 3 n = 3, 10%; grade 4 n = 3, 10%) and oligodendroglioma (grade 2 n = 10, 34%; grade 3 n = 4, 14%). Treatments received prior to ivosidenib included surgical resection (n = 23, 79%), radiation (n = 16, 55%), temozolomide (n = 15, 52%), procarbazine, lomustine, vincristine (PCV, n = 2, 7%), bevacizumab (n = 3, 10%), lomustine (n = 2, 7%) and pembrolizumab (n = 1, 3%). Four patients received additional treatment in between ivosidenib and vorasidenib treatment. Ten of 16 (63%) patients who experienced disease progression on ivosidenib achieved stable disease and remain on vorasidenib, while 6 (37%) had continued progression. Eleven patients with stable disease on ivosidenib transitioned to vorasidenib following FDA approval and remained without progression. Two patients who transitioned to vorasidenib due to ivosidenib-related adverse effects (diarrhea and fatigue) experienced symptom resolution and maintained disease stability. Conclusions Vorasidenib demonstrated clinical efficacy in patients with IDH-mutant gliomas previously treated with ivosidenib. Notably, stable patients who transitioned maintained disease stability, while some of those with progressive disease achieved stabilization with vorasidenib. These findings support vorasidenib as a viable therapeutic option following ivosidenib exposure.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Schultz et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2cf6aefaef96ed7f0584e4https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npag057
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 196P OC201 and OC202e synergistically suppress EMT and metastasis by dual inhibition of PKCε–NFκB signaling and autophagy in pancreatic cancer2026
  2. 2NCOG-44. Experience with vorasidenib in patients with grade 3 or 4 IDH-mutant gliomas2025
  3. 3INNV-16. Off-Label Use of Vorasidenib in IDH-Mutant Grade 3 and 4 Gliomas: A Single-Institution Experience2025
  4. 4P12.23.B IDH INHIBITION AT RELAPSE?2025
  5. 5INNV-41. Real-World utilization of vorasidenib in patients with IDH-mutant glioma: early insights on patient characteristics, disease history, and prior treatment patterns2025