PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 14, 2026Coordination Chemistry Reviews2 citationsOpen Access

Harnessing cobalt coordination chemistry for water splitting: molecular design, electronic structure modulation, and catalytic mechanisms

View Full Paper
AIAqsa IrshadABAli BahadurMJMohsin Javed

Key Points

  • This review aims to discuss the role of cobalt coordination chemistry in enhancing the efficiency of water splitting for clean hydrogen production.
  • Comparison of cobalt catalysts with noble metal catalysts in electrochemical water splitting.
  • Discussion on the structural and electronic tuning of cobalt-based electrocatalysts.
  • Analysis of synthesis routes and degradation mechanisms of cobalt catalysts.
  • Optimized cobalt catalysts show competitive performance with IrO2 and RuO2, achieving best η10 = 157 mV in alkaline OER.
  • Lower cost cobalt cataysts demonstrate low overpotentials and high catalytic metrics.
  • Identification of key electronic descriptors for cobalt catalysts aids in scalable synthesis strategies.

Abstract

The growing severity of climate change and rising energy demand for fossil fuels have increased interest in exploring clean energy and renewable sources. Electrochemical water splitting using renewable energy inputs has been considered the most promising approach to producing clean hydrogen (H 2 ). Water splitting involves oxygen evolution (OER) at the anode and hydrogen evolution reactions (HER) at the cathode. Common catalysts for OER and HER are composed of noble metals and non-metals, their alloys, and their compounds, but the high cost, scarcity, and stability of noble metals hinder wider application. To tackle this, cobalt-based complexes have been found to be homogeneous catalysts for both OER and HER, meeting the demand for low overpotentials. Cobalt complexes are highly promising, cost-effective electrocatalysts for electrochemical water splitting (EC-WS), and they can be precisely tuned both electronically and structurally in metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), layered double hydroxides (LDHs), phosphides, chalcogenides, and single-atom catalysts (SACs). Selective tuning of their σ-donors, π-acceptors, and redox-active (non-innocent) ligands gives rise to different and measurable shifts of the cobalt d-band center, of e G orbital filling, and of the Co 2+ /Co 3+ /Co 4+ redox accessibility, respectively. This review explores the cobalt coordination environment, its donor/acceptor properties, its geometry, its oxidation state, and its nuclearity, and how these affect the three key HER/OER catalytic metrics: overpotential, Tafel slope, and turnover frequency (TOF). An inter-study comparison of various systems reveals that low-cost cobalt catalysts, in particular with optimized coordination environments: multinuclear cubane architectures and dual-site phosphide systems, are as competitive (or more) as IrO 2 and RuO 2 systems in alkaline OER (best ɳ 10 = 157 mV). We further critically assess the synthesis routes, degradation mechanisms (ligand dissociation, cobalt leaching, phase reconstruction), and homogeneous vs. heterogeneous aspects of cobalt catalysts under operating conditions of water splitting. The review ends with quantitative electronic descriptor targets and actionable strategies for scalable synthesis and commercially viable development.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Irshad et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2e456cb1cc60ccdea8a7d4https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2026.218187
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper