PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 14, 2026Case Studies in Construction Materials1 citationsOpen Access

Life cycle assessment-based multi-dimensional evaluation of embodied carbon in concrete structures and structural scheme optimization

View Full Paper
QSQiang SongYLYuchen LuDNDitao Niu

Key Points

  • This study aims to enhance decision support for embodied carbon assessment in concrete structures through a multidimensional evaluation framework.
  • Developed an embodied carbon accounting model covering material production, transportation, and manufacturing stages.
  • Established a comprehensive low-carbon evaluation system at the structural level.
  • Analyzed a multi-storey public building as a case study.
  • Carbon emissions primarily stem from reinforcement works (44.72% of total emissions).
  • The frame-shear wall structure scored the highest in low-carbon performance (0.603).
  • Optimizing binder materials and reinforcing strategies could reduce carbon emissions by up to 20.12% and improve scores to 0.691.

Abstract

To improve the decision-support capability of embodied carbon assessment for concrete structures, this study proposes a structural-level multidimensional low-carbon evaluation framework based on life cycle assessment (LCA). An embodied carbon accounting model covering the stages of material production, transportation, and concrete manufacturing was established, and a multidimensional comprehensive low-carbon evaluation system at the structural level was developed. A multi-storey public building was selected as the case study for analysis. The results indicate that the carbon emissions of the case project are mainly dominated by reinforcement works, floor systems, and foundation systems, among which reinforcement accounts for 44.72% of the total emissions. The overall low-carbon performance of the project is classified as level III, with a comprehensive evaluation score of 0.546. Among different structural systems, the frame–shear wall structure achieved the highest comprehensive evaluation score (0.603), demonstrating the best low-carbon performance. Optimization scenario analysis shows that low-carbon reinforcement adoption and binder material optimization are the most sensitive emission reduction pathways. Under the synergistic effects of multiple optimization measures, the carbon emissions of the main structural system can be reduced by up to 20.12%, while the comprehensive evaluation score can be improved to 0.691. This study provides a reference for embodied carbon accounting, low-carbon decision-making optimization, and engineering applications of concrete structures.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Song et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2e45adb1cc60ccdea8a969https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2026.e06233
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Parametric study on the decarbonization potential of structural system and concrete mix design choices for mid-rise concrete buildings2024 · 8 citations
  2. 2Dual-Layer Sustainable Optimization Framework: An Application to Building Structure Floor Design2026 · 1 citations
  3. 3Research on Low Carbon During the Construction Design Process Based on BIM and Life Cycle Assessment2026
  4. 4A Practical Framework for Cradle-to-Site Embodied Carbon Assessment: Application to a Multifamily Residential Building in Faro, Portugal2026 · 1 citations
  5. 5Life Cycle Sustainable Design Optimization of Building Structural Components: A Hybrid Approach Incorporating Genetic Algorithm and Machine Learning2025