PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 14, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Managing the Crisis: AI and the Demise of National Sovereignty?

MBMohammad Sharif Sharifi Poor BgheshmiMSMahsa Sharajsharifi

Key Points

  • This research aims to examine how artificial intelligence reshapes national sovereignty and regulatory norms.
  • Review of over 30 peer-reviewed academic and policy sources published from 2018 to 2025
  • Qualitative, interdisciplinary methodology encompassing law, political theory, and ethics
  • Critical analysis of data localization, strategic autonomy, and international cooperation frameworks
  • Growing asymmetries observed between state authority and corporate power over digital infrastructures
  • Emerging hybrid governance models that integrate states, civil society, and corporations
  • Need for reconceptualization of sovereignty to include ethical and infrastructural dimensions

Abstract

This study investigates the evolving crisis of national sovereignty in the context of artificial intelligence and the expanding power of transnational technology corporations. Drawing from over thirty peer-reviewed academic and policy sources published between 2018 and 2025, this paper critically examines how traditional concepts of sovereignty—particularly data, digital, technological, and normative sovereignty—are being redefined by global AI infrastructures and the algorithmic authority of private firms. Employing a qualitative, interdisciplinary methodology grounded in law, political theory, and ethics, the research reveals growing asymmetries between state authority and corporate influence over digital infrastructures, data governance, and regulatory norms. Our findings highlight divergent policy responses, including efforts to reassert sovereign control through data localization, the pursuit of strategic autonomy, and emerging international cooperation frameworks. The study also evaluates normative debates surrounding legitimacy, democratic oversight, and algorithmic accountability. The study concludes that sovereignty in the AI era must be reconceptualized beyond territorial jurisdiction to include infrastructural and ethical dimensions, necessitating hybrid governance models that integrate states, civil society, and corporations, while prioritizing democratic legitimacy and public interest.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bgheshmi et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2e45d5b1cc60ccdea8ac7dhttps://doi.org/10.22059/wsps.2025.396021.1522
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Credible Sovereignty: Operationalizing AI Governance Across Infrastructure, Data, and Models: A Systematic Review2026
  2. 2From Human Sovereignty to Algorithmic Sovereignty2025
  3. 3Algorithmic Sovereignty and the New Security Dependencies: How Foreign AI Surveillance Technologies Reshape Domestic Autonomy in the Global Sout2025 · 4 citations
  4. 4Exporting Autonomy, Importing Dependency: The Geopolitical Work of “Sovereign AI”2025
  5. 5Digital Disintegration: Techno-Blocs and Strategic Sovereignty in the AI Era2025