PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 14, 2026Discover Sustainability0 citationsOpen Access

Performance driven form finding methodology for energy efficient building design based on energy consumption optimization

YHYaqoob Al HindasiMIMarjan IlbeigiOTOmid Ebrahimi Tajadod

Key Points

  • The aim is to assess how building shape and orientation affect energy consumption during design.
  • Five common building shapes (square, rectangular, L-shaped, U-shaped, H-shaped) were examined for energy impacts.
  • A genetic algorithm in Grasshopper identified energy-efficient designs while using EnergyPlus for energy assessment.
  • Buildings were analyzed under 0-360° rotation to understand orientation effects on energy use.
  • Elongated and articulated forms showed higher energy demands, exceeding 135 units; compact shapes averaged around 128 units.
  • Greater west-facing glazing led to increased cooling demands, indicating façade arrangement's significance.
  • Thermal behavior influenced energy variation primarily, with heating and cooling loads contributing significantly.

Abstract

In order to assess the influence of building morphology and orientation on operational energy consumption during the conceptual design stage, this study suggests a performance-driven form-finding process that combines parametric modeling, dynamic energy simulation, and evolutionary optimization. In order to separate geometry and orientation impacts, five common plan typologies square, rectangular, L-shaped, U-shaped, and H-shaped were methodically examined under constant floor-area conditions and rotated over a full 0–360° range. A genetic algorithm written in Grasshopper was used to find low-energy combinations and prevailing geometric trends, and EnergyPlus was used to assess annual energy use. The findings show that whereas elongated and articulated morphologies show higher energy demand and significant susceptibility to rotation, compact and geometrically symmetric shapes continuously achieve reduced annual energy consumption and exhibit remarkable robustness to orientation changes. According to quantitative study, wide and articulated forms often exceeded 132–135 units, with high-energy outliers topping 150 units, whereas compact forms’ median energy use clustered around 127–129 units. Performance was shown to be primarily influenced by façade arrangement; greater west-facing glazing was highly associated with higher cooling demand, although rotation angle alone had a relatively less impact. The predominance of form-mediated thermal behavior was confirmed by the fact that heating and cooling loads accounted for the majority of energy variation across all design choices. The suggested approach provides a clear and repeatable framework for energy-literate form decision-making by converting optimization results into interpretable geometric tendencies rather than isolated optima.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hindasi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2e4608b1cc60ccdea8ada7https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-026-03743-3
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Optimizing High rise Building form for energy performance using Generative Design Framework2024
  2. 2Optimizing architectural multi-dimensional forms; a hybrid approach integrating approximate evolutionary search, clustering and local optimization2024 · 14 citations
  3. 3Optimizing High rise Building form for energy performance using Generative Design Framework2024 · 1 citations
  4. 4Early-Stage Design and Energy Performance Analysis of Residential Buildings in Hot–Arid Climates Using BIM-Based Modeling Tools2026
  5. 5A Geometry Simplification Strategy for Early-Stage Energy-Oriented Design of Office Buildings in Hot–Humid Regions: Application to Orientation Optimization2026