PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 14, 2026Chinese Health Care0 citations

Application of CBL+Mini-CEX Teaching Mode in Urological Nursing Education

View Full Paper
CYChangmin YU彭彭利元PZPingping ZHOU

Key Points

  • The aim is to assess the effectiveness of the CBL combined with Mini-CEX teaching mode in urological nursing education.
  • 60 nursing students randomly assigned to two groups: control (traditional teaching) and observation (CBL + Mini-CEX)
  • Assessment of team cohesion, critical thinking, learning ability, medical service quality, and academic performance before and after teaching.
  • Post-teaching, the observation group's team cohesion increased significantly compared to the control group (P<0.05).
  • Post-teaching critical thinking scores in the observation group were significantly higher than in the control group (P<0.05).
  • Post-teaching learning ability and quality of service scores were also significantly higher in the observation group (P<0.05).

Abstract

摘要: 目的 研究案例教学法(CBL)联合迷你临床演练评估(Mini-CEX)教学模式在泌尿外科护理教学中的应用效果。 方法 选择2024年1月—2024年12月在江苏省人民医院重庆医院泌尿外科学习的护生60名,按照随机数表法分为对照组和观察组,每组30名,对照组采用传统带教模式,观察组采用CBL联合Mini-CEX教学模式,比较两组护生带教前后团队凝聚力;带教前后评判性思维评分;带教前后学习能力评分;带教前后医疗服务质量评分;带教前后理论知识、专业技能和个案撰写成绩。 结果 带教前,两组团队凝聚力评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);带教后,两组团队凝聚力评分升高,观察组高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(PP>0.05);带教后,两组评判性思维评分升高,观察组高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(PP>0.05);带教后,两组学习能力评分升高,观察组高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(PP>0.05);带教后,观察组医疗服务质量评分升高,观察组高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(PP>0.05);带教后,两组理论知识、专业技能和个案撰写成绩升高,观察组高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P 结论 泌尿外科护理教学中,应用CBL联合Mini-CEX教学模式,可提升学员的带教成绩、学习能力,帮助其形成评判性思维,增强团队凝聚力,并能够在后续护理中为患者提供良好的护理服务。

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

YU et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2e4632b1cc60ccdea8af84https://doi.org/10.70976/j.1009-8011.202503050037
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper