PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 14, 20260 citationsOpen Access

A Metric-Theoretic Proof of the Yang-Mills Mass Gap on ℝ⁴

View Full Paper
TGTimothy Gleason

Key Points

  • The aim is to prove the existence of a strictly positive mass gap for Yang-Mills gauge theory focused on SU(3).
  • Utilizes a conformal metric determined by the Clifford algebra Cl(4) and the spectral theory of the Laplace-Beltrami operator.
  • Assesses the convergence of Yang-Mills loop integrals to ln(4/3) via a holonomy expansion.
  • Derives the mass gap explicitly from the Clifford structure of ℝ⁴ with no free parameters.
  • Establishes a mass gap of Δ = Q_vac × exp(λ₁) = 221.7 MeV derived from the theory.
  • Demonstrates that UV divergences and renormalization are absent in this formulation.
  • Introduces a winding penalty c₂ = 1/4 that allows for the convergence of integrals.

Abstract

We prove the existence of a strictly positive mass gap for Yang-Mills gauge theory with gauge group SU (3) on ℝ⁴. The proof remains entirely within ℝ⁴ as a topological manifold while introducing a specific conformal metric g = Ω² (p) η whose form is uniquely determined by the Clifford algebra Cl (4) of the manifold and the spectral theory of the associated Laplace-Beltrami operator. Under this metric all Yang-Mills loop integrals converge to the finite value ln (4/3) via a holonomy expansion, with no ultraviolet divergences and no renormalization required: the UV divergence is structurally absent, not cancelled. The mass gap is derived explicitly as Δ = Qᵥac × exp (λ₁) = 221. 7 MeV, where all quantities are derived from the Clifford structure of ℝ⁴ and the electroweak vacuum with no free parameters. The key tool is the Clifford winding penalty c₂ = 1/4, the normalized trace of a single winding generator in Cl (4), which replaces the divergent UV tower Σ 1/n with the convergent geometric series Σ c₂ⁿ/n = ln (4/3).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Timothy Gleason (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2e465cb1cc60ccdea8b2e6https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20670276
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper