PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 14, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Cosmological Constraints on the Ψ-Field Moisten Universe Model: Resolving the Growth and Expansion History

View Full Paper
JZJosip Zencic

Key Points

  • The aim is to analyze the Ψ-field Moisten Universe model to resolve discrepancies in cosmic growth and expansion history.
  • Utilized observational data from Cosmic Chronometers and growth-rate measurements
  • Performed joint likelihood maximization using the Nelder-Mead optimization algorithm
  • Analyzed parameters A and m for the Ψ model and compared with the ΛCDM model
  • The Ψ model achieved χ2 = 22.34, better than ΛCDM's χ2 = 23.93
  • Maintained a matter density parameter Ωm = 0.3007
  • Established a stable Hubble constant at H0 = 67.07 km/s/Mpc

Abstract

We present a comprehensive cosmological data analysis of the newly proposed Ψ-field “MoistenUniverse” model, which introduces a classical scalar field with friction and mass to describe thebackground evolution and structure formation of the cosmos. By utilizing the latest observational data from Cosmic Chronometers (H(z)) and growth-rate measurements (fσ8), we performa joint likelihood maximization using the Nelder-Mead optimization algorithm across an unlockedparameter space. We demonstrate that the universe naturally selects the structural field constantsA ≈ 0.25 (damping) and m ≈ 3.0 (mass), precisely mirroring the theoretical foundations of themodel. The Ψ model yields a lower total chi-squared (χ2 = 22.34) compared to the standardΛCDM model (χ2 = 23.93), while successfully preserving a physically robust matter density parameter (Ωm = 0.3007) and establishing a highly stable Hubble constant (H0 = 67.07 km/s/Mpc).These results suggest that the Ψ-field framework provides a mathematically consistent and observationally superior alternative to the standard cosmological paradigm, naturally bridging the gapbetween expansion history and cosmic growth.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Josip Zencic (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2e46b3b1cc60ccdea8b57ahttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20673311
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper