PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 14, 2026Clinical Cancer Research0 citationsOpen Access

Second Primary Malignancy Risk in Patients with Multiple Myeloma Receiving CAR T-Cell Therapy or Other Systemic Anticancer Treatments: A Real-World Comparative Study

View Full Paper
ASAttaya SuvannasankhaMLMengying LiOOOmonefe O. Omofuma

Key Points

  • This research investigates the risk of second primary malignancies (SPM) in multiple myeloma patients treated with CAR T therapy compared to other systemic treatments.
  • Analyzed data from adult patients with multiple myeloma who started CAR T therapy or other systemic anticancer therapies using Komodo Health claims data.
  • Estimated cumulative incidence of SPM over 24 months and calculated P values for differences over time.
  • Included 435 CAR T patients and 12,268 patients receiving other therapies, with a median follow-up of 11.8 months.
  • At 24 months, the risk of any SPM was similar between CAR T therapy (24.1%) and other SACTs (22.3%), P=0.31.
  • Bone marrow examinations were more common after CAR T therapy (47% vs. 13% within the first 3 months).
  • Higher risk of hematologic SPM was noted with CAR T therapy (17.9% vs. 13.1%), P=0.04.

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aims to compare the risk of second primary malignancy (SPM) between patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who received CAR T therapy versus other systemic anticancer therapies (SACTs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adult patients with MM who initiated CAR T therapy or other SACTs were identified from Komodo Health claims data and weighted to balance baseline characteristics. Cumulative incidence of SPM was estimated over 24 months, and P values calculated for difference between 0 and 24 months. RESULTS: The study included 435 patients who received CAR T therapy and 12,268 patients who received other SACTs (median follow-up: 11.8 months). Compared with other SACTs, CAR T therapy was associated with similar risks of any SPM (at 24 months: 24.1% vs. 22.3%,P0-24 mo's = 0.31) and solid SPM (9.1% vs. 11.5%, P0-24 mo's = 0.32), but significantly higher risk of hematologic SPM (17.9% vs. 13.1%, P0-24 mo's = 0.04). In a sensitivity analysis requiring ≥2 claims to identify an SPM, difference in hematologic SPM risk was attenuated (5.5% vs. 4.9%, P0-24 mo's = 0.08). Notably, bone marrow examinations were more common following CAR T therapy (e.g., 47% vs. 13% at 0-3 months). CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world dataset with relatively short follow-up, patients with MM appeared to have a higher risk of hematologic SPM following CAR T therapy compared with other SACTs. However, misclassification and detection bias cannot be ruled out. The association warrants further evaluation. Physicians should be vigilant for myeloid malignancies after CAR T therapy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Suvannasankha et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2e4779b1cc60ccdea8c08ahttps://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-25-4068
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper