PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 14, 2026Allergy0 citations

Cashew Reaction Thresholds, Its Predictors, and Very Low Validated Safe Doses, in a Large Allergic Population (Nut CRACKER Study)

View Full Paper
LNLiat NachshonWBW. Marty BlomSBSabina Bijlsma

Key Points

  • This study aims to determine cashew reaction thresholds and their predictors in a large population with cashew allergies.
  • Prospective cohort study analyzing oral food challenges (OFCs) for cashew allergy from 2014 to 2023.
  • Identified no observed adverse effect levels (NOAEL) and lowest observed adverse effect levels (LOAEL) for individual safe doses.
  • Analyzed data from 293 positive cashew OFCs to establish individual single highest tolerated doses (SHTDs).
  • ED01 for all patients was 0.2 mg (range 0.1–4.1); ED05 was 0.9 mg (range 0.2–14.8).
  • Pistachio co-allergy (p < 0.0001) and higher specific IgE levels to cashew and pistachio were associated with lower reaction thresholds.
  • Validated safe doses for 90% and 75% of the population were 0.1 mg and 1 mg protein, respectively.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Cashew is a widespread food allergen with a high rate of severe, and near‐fatal reactions. Understanding cashew reaction thresholds and its predictors might improve patients' management and precautionary allergen labeling. Methods A prospective cohort study with post hoc analysis of cashew oral food challenges (OFCs) performed at Shamir (Assaf‐Harofeh) Medical Center between July‐2014 and May‐2023. OFCs were performed according to either a diagnostic protocol in patients with suspected cashew allergy or an oral immunotherapy (OIT) protocol, intended to identify individual single highest tolerated dose (SHTD) at the beginning of OIT. No observed adverse effect levels and lowest observed adverse effect levels (NOAEL and LOAEL, respectively) of each OFC were identified. OFCs with extended dosing intervals were performed to determine individual validated SHTD (safe dose). Results Overall, 293 positive cashew OFCs (155 diagnostic‐OFCs and 138 OIT‐OFCs) were analyzed. The ED01 and ED05 for all patients were 0.2 mg (range 0.1–4.1) and 0.9 mg (range 0.2–14.8) for discrete, and 0.2 mg (range 0.1–11.7) and 1.2 mg (range 0.3–47.1) for cumulative doses, respectively. Pistachio co‐allergy ( p < 0.0001), higher sIgE to cashew ( p = 0.004), Ana‐o‐3 ( p < 0.001) and pistachio ( p = 0.02), and an OIT‐OFC protocol ( p < 0.001) were associated with lower cashew thresholds. Cashew safe doses for 90% and 75% of the population were only 0.1 and 1 mg protein, respectively compared to 1 and 7.5–10 mg protein for sesame, walnut and peanut. Conclusions The population cashew ED05 is within the range of other nuts and seeds, but safe doses are lower. Pistachio co‐allergy and higher cashew and pistachio sensitization are risk factors for low reaction thresholds.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nachshon et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2e47f9b1cc60ccdea8c626https://doi.org/10.1111/all.70412
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Long‐term outcome of peanut oral immunotherapy—Real‐life experience2018 · 106 citations
  2. 2Allergic Reactions to Milk-Contaminated “Nondairy” Products1991 · 150 citations
  3. 3Cashew nut allergy is associated with a high risk of anaphylaxis2005 · 77 citations
  4. 4Single‐dose oral challenges to validate eliciting doses in children with cow’s milk allergy2021 · 36 citations
  5. 5Full range of population Eliciting Dose values for 14 priority allergenic foods and recommendations for use in risk characterization2020 · 146 citations