PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 2001The Journal of Physiology85 citationsOpen Access

Phasic mechanoreceptor stimuli can induce phasic activation of upper airway muscles in humans

View Full Paper
TAToshiki AkahoshiDWDavid P. WhiteJEJill Edwards

Key Result

Within-breath phasic changes in airway mechanoreceptor stimuli were highly correlated with genioglossal activation, with epiglottic pressure explaining 93% of the variation in peak GG EMG.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=19)

Structured PICO

P
Population
19 healthy adults studied while awake during passive mechanical ventilation and spontaneous breathing.
E
Exposure
Passive mechanical ventilation across normal physiological ranges of breathing rates (13-19 breaths min-1) and volumes (0.5-1.0 l)
C
Comparator
Spontaneous breathing across the physiological range of end-tidal carbon dioxide (PET,CO2; 32-45 mmHg)
O
Outcome
Genioglossal electromyogram (GG EMG) activity and its relationship with airway mechanoreceptor stimuli (negative pressure or flow)surrogate

Upper airway dilator muscles can be activated throughout inspiration via ongoing mechanoreceptor reflexes, providing a feedback mechanism to protect airway patency.

Abstract

Upper airway dilator muscles are phasically activated throughout breathing by respiratory pattern generator neurons. Studies have shown that non-physiological upper airway mechanoreceptive stimuli (e.g. rapidly imposed pulses of negative pressure) also activate these muscles. Such reflexes may become activated during conditions that alter airway resistance in order to stabilise airway patency. 2. To determine the contribution of ongoing mechanoreceptive reflexes to phasic activity of airway dilators, we assessed genioglossal electromyogram (GG EMG: rectified with moving time average of 100 ms) during slow (physiological) oscillations in negative pressure generated spontaneously and passively (negative pressure ventilator). 3. Nineteen healthy adults were studied while awake, during passive mechanical ventilation across normal physiological ranges of breathing rates (13-19 breaths min-1) and volumes (0.5-1.0 l) and during spontaneous breathing across the physiological range of end-tidal carbon dioxide (PET,CO2; 32-45 mmHg). 4. Within-breath phasic changes in airway mechanoreceptor stimuli (negative pressure or flow) were highly correlated with within-breath phasic genioglossal activation, probably representing a robust mechanoreceptive reflex. These reflex relationships were largely unchanged by alterations in central drive to respiratory pump muscles or the rate of mechanical ventilation within the ranges studied. A multivariate model revealed that tonic GG EMG, PET,CO2 and breath duration provided no significant independent information in the prediction of inspiratory peak GG EMG beyond that provided by epiglottic pressure, which alone explained 93 % of the variation in peak GG EMG across all conditions. The overall relationship was: Peak GG EMG = 79.7 - (11.3 X Peak epiglottic pressure), where GG EMG is measured as percentage of baseline, and epiglottic pressure is in cmH2O. 5. These data provide strong evidence that upper airway dilator muscles can be activated throughout inspiration via ongoing mechanoreceptor reflexes. Such a feedback mechanism is likely to be active on a within-breath basis to protect upper airway patency in awake humans. This mechanism could mediate the increased genioglossal activity observed in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (i.e. reflex compensation for an anatomically smaller airway).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Akahoshi et al. (2001) conducted an observational in Healthy (n=19). Changes in airway mechanoreceptor stimuli (negative pressure or flow) was evaluated on Genioglossal electromyogram (GG EMG) activation. Within-breath phasic changes in airway mechanoreceptor stimuli were highly correlated with genioglossal activation, with epiglottic pressure explaining 93% of the variation in peak GG EMG.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2f20e1cbbd97c2661c4271https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.0677h.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper