PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 15, 2026Journal of Chinese Political Science0 citationsOpen Access

Personalizing Party Ideology: Institutional Change and Ideological Governance in China’s Politburo Collective Study Sessions, 2002–2025

YBYu BinXavier University

Key Points

  • The study aims to analyze how ideological governance in China has shifted under Xi Jinping since 2002.
  • Analyzed an original dataset of 177 Politburo Collective Study Session reports from 2002 to 2025.
  • Examined changes in session format, speaker composition, thematic agenda, and ideological framing.
  • Notable decline in pluralistic participation during sessions under Xi Jinping.
  • Increased emphasis on security themes and personalized ideological authority.
  • Demonstrates how authoritarian institutions can adapt to reinforce centralized leadership.

Abstract

Abstract The Politburo Collective Study Sessions (PCSS) have served as a key institutional mechanism of elite ideological governance in China since 2002. Over the past two decades, these sessions have adapted to shifting leadership priorities, particularly under Xi Jinping, who has reoriented ideological governance from collective Marxist–Leninist frameworks toward leader-centered slogans and symbolic personalization. Drawing on an original dataset of 177 PCSS reports from December 2002 to June 2025, this study examines changes in session format, speaker composition, thematic agenda, and ideological framing. It reveals a marked decline in pluralistic participation and institutionalized ideological framing under Xi, alongside a growing emphasis on security themes and personalized ideological authority. This transformation illustrates how enduring authoritarian institutions can be repurposed to reinforce centralized leadership while maintaining formal continuity. These findings contribute to scholarship on ideological governance and institutional adaptation in contemporary Chinese authoritarianism by specifying how personalization is institutionalized through routine elite political rituals.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yu Bin (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2f97e8a1cfeec490828f68https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-026-09948-7
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Structures of Survival: Typologies, Instrumentalization, and the Political Reproduction of Communist Party of China's Ideology after Reform and Opening up2025
  2. 2From Teachers to Preachers: Xi Jinping and Changing Priorities in Chinese Ideo-Political Education2024 · 2 citations
  3. 3The Resurgence of Ideology under Xi Jinping and International Relations Scholarship in China2024 · 2 citations
  4. 4Public sector reform and party dominance: China’s 2023 Party-state institutional reform2026
  5. 5The Discursive Force and the New Trend of Political Science in China2025