PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 15, 2026Journal of the American College of Cardiology228 citations

Contrast nephropathy: Review focusing on prevention

View Full Paper
MMMicha T. MaederMKMaja KleinTFThomas Fehr

Key Points

  • This review examines prevention strategies for contrast nephropathy, particularly in high-risk patients.
  • Literature review focused on interventions like intravenous hydration, iodinated contrast agents, and prophylactic medications.
  • Analysis of various preventive approaches, including low-dose dopamine, fenoldopam, and N-acetylcysteine.
  • Hydration strategies using saline show promise in reducing risk of contrast nephropathy.
  • High-dose N-acetylcysteine (1,200 mg twice daily) may benefit patients with advanced renal insufficiency or high contrast doses.
  • Prophylactic hemodialysis was found ineffective, whereas hemofiltration demonstrated marked benefit.

Abstract

Contrast nephropathy (CN) accounts for significant morbidity and mortality. Patients with pre-existing renal insufficiency, especially those with diabetic nephropathy, are at particular risk. Medullary hypoxia due to decreased renal blood flow and direct cytotoxicity contribute to the pathogenesis. Contrast nephropathy is usually defined as an increase in serum creatinine concentration >0.5 mg/dl or 25% above the baseline level within 48 h. Intravenous hydration (saline 0.45%, if tolerated 0.9% at a rate of 1 ml/kg/h) 12 h before and after contrast exposure and the use of low or iso-osmolality contrast agents are advisable. The benefit of low-dose dopamine as well as the selective dopamine-1 receptor agonist fenoldopam is unproven. Studies on the effectiveness of the adenosine antagonist theophylline have led to conflicting results. Because theophylline has a narrow therapeutic range and may be associated with adverse effects, it is not a prophylactic agent of first choice. The administration of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) has been evaluated in several trials with inconsistent results. Newer data suggest a benefit of high-dose NAC (1,200 mg twice daily) for patients receiving high doses (>140 ml) of contrast agent, or those with advanced renal insufficiency (creatinine >2.5 mg/dl). Whereas prophylactic hemodialysis does not prevent CN, a recent study demonstrated a marked benefit of prophylactic hemofiltration.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Maeder et al. (2004) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a3017eb24c2c42f24de9f52https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2004.06.075
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper