PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 16, 2026Journal of Clinical Hypertension0 citationsOpen Access

Diastolic Morning Surge Improves Risk Stratification for Subclinical Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction in Ambulatory‐Defined Isolated Diastolic Hypertension

View Full Paper
ACAyhan CosgunHÖHüseyin Ören

Key Result

Isolated diastolic hypertension was strongly associated with subclinical left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (OR 2.79; 95% CI 1.79-3.77), and adding diastolic morning surge improved discrimination.

Key Points

  • To determine if diastolic morning surge improves risk stratification for subclinical left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in isolated diastolic hypertension.
  • Cross-sectional analysis of 737 untreated adults undergoing 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and echocardiography.
  • Defined isolated diastolic hypertension as mean diastolic blood pressure ≥80 mmHg with systolic pressure <130 mmHg.
  • Utilized 2016 ASE/EACVI criteria to adjudicate left ventricular diastolic dysfunction.
  • Isolated diastolic hypertension was independently associated with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (OR 2.79, 95% CI 1.79–3.77).
  • Diastolic morning surge provided independent incremental information regarding left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (OR 1.44 per 5 mmHg, 95% CI 1.09–1.90).
  • Incorporating diastolic morning surge improved model discrimination (AUC increased from 0.76 to 0.81; p = 0.041) and reduced prediction error.

Study Design

Type

Cross-Sectional (n=737)

Structured PICO

Does the incorporation of diastolic morning surge improve risk stratification for subclinical left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in adults with ambulatory-defined isolated diastolic hypertension?

P
Population
737 untreated adults undergoing 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and echocardiography (353 with isolated diastolic hypertension, 384 normotensive controls).
E
Exposure
Assessment of diastolic morning surge (DMS) in the context of ambulatory-defined isolated diastolic hypertension (IDH)
C
Comparator
Normotensive controls (for IDH comparison) and risk models without DMS (for incremental value comparison)
O
Outcome
Subclinical left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) adjudicated using 2016 ASE/EACVI criteriasurrogate

Ambulatory-defined isolated diastolic hypertension is strongly associated with subclinical left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, and measuring diastolic morning surge significantly improves risk stratification beyond mean ambulatory pressure values.

Main Result

Odds Ratio: 2.79 (95% CI 1.79–3.77)

Abstract

ABSTRACT Isolated diastolic hypertension (IDH) is frequently considered a lower‐risk phenotype due to preserved systolic pressure; however, sustained ambulatory diastolic load may promote early myocardial remodeling. Dynamic circadian variation, particularly diastolic morning surge (DMS), may impose additional hemodynamic stress not reflected by mean blood pressure values. We evaluated whether incorporation of DMS improves risk stratification for subclinical left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) in ambulatory‐defined IDH. In this cross‐sectional study, 737 untreated adults undergoing standardized 24‐h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and echocardiography were analyzed (353 IDH; 384 normotensive controls). IDH was defined as 24‐h mean diastolic blood pressure ≥80 mmHg with systolic pressure <130 mmHg, and LVDD was adjudicated using 2016 ASE/EACVI criteria. In adjusted analyses, IDH was independently associated with LVDD (OR 2.79, 95% CI 1.79–3.77). Addition of DMS attenuated but did not eliminate the IDH association and provided independent incremental information (OR 1.44 per 5 mmHg, 95% CI 1.09–1.90). Incorporation of DMS improved discrimination (AUC 0.76 to 0.81; p = 0.041), strengthened calibration, reduced overall prediction error, and provided greater net clinical benefit across intermediate risk thresholds. Ambulatory‐defined IDH is strongly associated with subclinical LVDD, and assessment of dynamic diastolic load through DMS offers incremental information beyond mean ambulatory pressure values for model‐based discrimination and phenotypic characterization of LVDD.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cosgun et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Isolated diastolic hypertension (n=737). Isolated diastolic hypertension (IDH) vs. Normotensive controls was evaluated on Subclinical left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) (OR 2.79, 95% CI 1.79-3.77). Isolated diastolic hypertension was strongly associated with subclinical left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (OR 2.79; 95% CI 1.79-3.77), and adding diastolic morning surge improved discrimination.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a31572eaf7cf7f8256b3dfbhttps://doi.org/10.1111/jch.70299
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper