PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 16, 2026Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery3 citationsOpen Access

Comparative outcomes of anticoagulant versus antiplatelet therapy in coronary endarterectomy: a meta-analysis

GCGiuseppe ComentaleAAArmia Ahmadi-HadadRMRachele Manzo

Key Result

Dual antiplatelet therapy significantly reduced short-term myocardial infarction rates to 1% compared to 8% with anticoagulant therapy (p<0.001) in patients undergoing coronary endarterectomy.

Key Points

  • This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the differences in short- and long-term outcomes between anticoagulant therapy and antiplatelet therapy following coronary endarterectomy.
  • Reviewed studies from PubMed, Embase, and Medline without restrictions on year or language.
  • Two reviewers screened studies in a blinded manner, with discrepancies reconciled by a third reviewer.
  • Included nineteen studies in the final analysis.
  • Short-term mortality rates were similar between anticoagulant therapy (ACT) and double antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) (p = 0.15).
  • Short-term myocardial infarction (MI) was significantly lower in DAPT patients (p < 0.001).
  • Long-term graft patency and MI events were comparable between different DAPT regimens (p = 0.09 and p = 0.77, respectively).

Study Design

Type

Meta-Analysis

Structured PICO

Does dual antiplatelet therapy reduce mortality and myocardial infarction compared to anticoagulant therapy in patients undergoing coronary endarterectomy?

P
Population
A meta-analysis of 19 studies evaluating the impact of dual antiplatelet therapy versus anticoagulant therapy on short- and long-term outcomes in patients undergoing coronary endarterectomy.
I
Intervention
Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT, aspirin + clopidogrel or aspirin + ticagrelor)
C
Comparator
Anticoagulant therapy (mostly sequential regimen of warfarin followed by DAPT or single antiplatelet therapy)
O
Outcome
Postoperative mortality, postoperative myocardial infarction (MI), and graft patency at short-term (<30 days) and long-term (>6 months) follow-uphard clinical

Postoperative use of DAPT seems to offer more benefits compared to anticoagulant therapy by reducing short-term MI rates after coronary endarterectomy, with no difference in mortality.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 1% vs 8%

p-value: p=<0.001

Limitations

  • Lack of large studies or randomized trials on the topic
  • Varied postoperative therapeutic management protocols among centers
  • Variation in therapeutic regimens and timing of treatment switches across studies
  • Potential publication bias
  • lack of big studies or randomized trials on the topic
  • varied postoperative therapeutic management protocols among the centers
  • variation in therapeutic regimens and the timing of treatment switches across the studies

Abstract

Abstract Background Coronary endarterectomy (CE) has recently returned to the limelight due to its advantages in achieving full revascularization in very complex cases. However, to date, there are no guidelines concerning the use of postoperative antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy (ACT). Aim In light of this, the present meta-analysis aimed to compare the impact of ACT versus antiplatelet therapy on short- and long-term outcomes after CE. Methods PubMed, Embase, and Medline databases were searched without any restriction on the year or the language. Two reviewers screened the studies in two rounds in a blinded manner and extracted the data into an Excel spreadsheet. The third reviewer reconciled discrepancies. Results Nineteen studies made our final selection. Short- and long-term mortality was similar between patients treated with ACT and those receiving double antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) ( p = 0.15 and p = 0.98, respectively). Short-term myocardial infarction (MI) was significantly lower among DAPT patients ( p < 0.001); while during the long-term follow-up, MI events were similar ( p = 0.77). Dual antiplatelet agents were also compared, suggesting that DAPT with aspirin + clopidogrel and aspirin + ticagrelor regimens lead to similar long-term graft patency ( p = 0.09). Conclusion Postoperative mortality seems to be not affected by the anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy after CE. DAPT leads to a greater reduction in short-term MI rates; thus, the postoperative use of DAPT seems to offer more benefits compared to ACT therapy. Long-term MI events, however, were comparable. Long-term graft patency analysis of DAPT with aspirin + clopidogrel and aspirin + ticagrelor has not revealed any superiority.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Comentale et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in Coronary endarterectomy. Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) vs. Anticoagulant therapy was evaluated on Short-term myocardial infarction (MI) (p=<0.001). Dual antiplatelet therapy significantly reduced short-term myocardial infarction rates to 1% compared to 8% with anticoagulant therapy (p<0.001) in patients undergoing coronary endarterectomy.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a31572eaf7cf7f8256b3e06https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-026-02221-9
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper