PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 1, 2003Applications of Mathematics472 citations

On Implicit Constitutive Theories

View Full Paper
KRKeshava Rajagopal

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

In classical constitutive models such as the Navier-Stokes fluid model, and the Hookean or neo-Hookean solid models, the stress is given explicitly in terms of kinematical quantities. Models for viscoelastic and inelastic responses on the other hand are usually implicit relationships between the stress and the kinematical quantities. Another class of problems wherein it would be natural to develop implicit constitutive theories, though seldom resorted to, are models for bodies that are constrained. In general, for such materials the material moduli that characterize the extra stress could depend on the constraint reaction. (E.g., in an incompressible fluid, the viscosity could depend on the constraint reaction associated with the constraint of incompressibility. In the linear case, this would be the pressure.) Here we discuss such implicit constitutive theories. We also discuss a class of bodies described by an implicit constitutive relation for the specific Helmholtz potential that depends on both the stress and strain, and which does not dissipate in any admissible process. The stress in such a material is not derivable from a potential, i.e., the body is not hyperelastic (Green elastic).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Keshava Rajagopal (2003) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a322bd92acd7f61e3cc22dchttps://doi.org/10.1023/a:1026062615145
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper