PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 17, 2026Buildings0 citationsOpen Access

An Integrated AHP–Kano–Walkability Framework for Evaluating and Optimizing Campus Pedestrian Systems: A Case Study of Huaqiao University

View Full Paper
XZXi ZhangNZNanxin ZhangXDXueyan Ding

Key Points

  • This research aims to develop a comprehensive framework for evaluating and optimizing campus pedestrian systems by integrating AHP and the Kano model.
  • Constructed a multidimensional evaluation system covering accessibility, safety, comfort, landscape quality, and service functionality.
  • Employed GIS analysis and field investigation to support the evaluation.
  • Conducted questionnaire surveys and expert evaluations to analyze objective environmental importance against subjective user satisfaction.
  • Safety and accessibility attributes are identified as must-be requirements preventing dissatisfaction.
  • Environmental cleanliness and chosen experiential elements enhance user satisfaction more significantly.
  • Landscape-related indicators show weak perceptual sensitivity, highlighting the task-oriented nature of campus pedestrian behavior.

Abstract

Increasing attention has been directed toward walkability evaluation because pedestrian environments are closely associated with mobility patterns, environmental quality, and everyday spatial experience. However, most existing walkability studies either emphasize objective spatial indicators or rely on subjective satisfaction surveys, while the relationship between expert evaluation and user satisfaction has received relatively limited attention, particularly regarding its nonlinear characteristics. In addition, walkability frameworks developed for urban public environments are often directly applied to university campuses without adequately considering the distinctive behavioral characteristics of campus pedestrian activities. To address these limitations, this study proposes an integrated AHP–Kano walkability evaluation framework for campus pedestrian systems. The framework combines the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) with the Kano model to establish a perception-sensitive and behavior-oriented evaluation structure. AHP is employed to determine the relative importance of environmental indicators through expert judgment, while the Kano model is introduced to capture the asymmetric effects of different environmental attributes on user satisfaction. GIS analysis and field investigation were employed as supplementary spatial diagnostic tools to support the interpretation of pedestrian–environment characteristics. Using the Xiamen campus of Huaqiao University as a case study, this research constructs a multidimensional evaluation system covering accessibility, safety, comfort, landscape quality, and service functionality. Questionnaire surveys and expert evaluations were conducted to analyze the relationship between objective environmental importance and subjective perceptual response. The results indicate that safety- and accessibility-related attributes primarily function as must-be requirements that prevent dissatisfaction, whereas environmental cleanliness and selected experiential elements exhibit stronger satisfaction-enhancing effects. Several landscape-related indicators, commonly emphasized in urban walkability studies, demonstrate relatively weak perceptual sensitivity in campus contexts, reflecting the task-oriented and time-constrained nature of campus pedestrian behavior. The present study extends existing walkability research in several important respects. Rather than relying on conventional linear assumptions, the proposed framework incorporates nonlinear perceptual responses into walkability evaluation. The findings further demonstrate that pedestrian perception is highly context-dependent in campus environments, while the integrated framework further provides a behavior-sensitive basis for prioritizing spatial interventions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a323aead50b63ecad205a8dhttps://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16122359
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper