PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 17, 2026Thermo0 citationsOpen Access

Thermoeconomic Analysis of a Cryogenic Power Plant for the Conversion of LNG Cold Energy into Electricity

View Full Paper
IBIgor BonefačićJGJosip GrbacTSTomislav Senčić

Key Points

  • The analysis aims to assess the energy recovery potential and thermoeconomic performance of LNG cold energy through various ORC configurations.
  • Evaluated single-, two-, and three-stage Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) configurations
  • Analyzed different working fluids and LNG regasification capacities
  • Calculated specific net power outputs, net energy efficiencies, exergy efficiencies, levelized cost of electricity, and specific investment costs.
  • Single-stage ORC configuration achieved a net power output of 45–55 kW/(kgLNG/s) with a net efficiency of 6.6–7.5%.
  • Two-stage configuration provided the highest efficiency at 10.1–11.2% and lowest LCOE at 80–105 €/MWh.
  • COS yielded the highest net power at 12.5 MW, while R32 demonstrated the best economic performance with 6000 €/kW SIC.

Abstract

This paper investigates the energy recovery potential of LNG cold energy using cryogenic binary cycles. The thermoeconomic performance of single-, two- and three-stage Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) configurations across different working fluids and LNG regasification capacities has been evaluated. The analysis shows that ORC-based LNG cold energy power units achieve specific net power outputs of 45–55 kW/(kgLNG/s) for single-stage, 74–83 kW/(kgLNG/s) for two-stage, and 79–88 kW/(kgLNG/s) for three-stage configurations. The corresponding net energy efficiencies are 6.6–7.5%, 10.1–11.2% and 10.8–12.0%, respectively, while the exergy efficiencies are 15.9–17.6%, 22.9–25.3%, and 24.3–26.8%, respectively. Two-stage systems achieve the lowest costs: a levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) of 80–105 €/MWh and a specific investment cost (SIC) of 6000–8300 €/kW. For most of the evaluated working fluids, the power gain from a third stage does not justify the increase in equipment costs. Among the evaluated working fluids, R32, R41 and R161 achieve the best economic performance, while carbonyl sulfide (COS), R32 and R161 achieve the best thermodynamic performance. The highest net power, 12.5 MW, is achieved with COS, whereas the lowest LCOE (80 €/MWh) and SIC (6000 €/kW) are obtained with R32, all for an LNG regasification capacity of 700,000 Sm3/h.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bonefačić et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a323aead50b63ecad205ab9https://doi.org/10.3390/thermo6020046
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper