PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 17, 2026African Journal of Range and Forage Science0 citations

Improved forage production and utilisation in mixed crop–livestock systems around watersheds in Ethiopia: opportunities and barriers

View Full Paper
SMShimelis MengistuAMAshenafi MengistuMBMelkamu Bezabih

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess the effectiveness of integrated interventions on forage adoption within mixed crop-livestock systems in Ethiopia.
  • Cross-sectional survey of 443 households in Sidama and Central Ethiopia
  • Comparative analysis of model and non-model watersheds using descriptive statistics and regression analysis
  • Assessment of factors influencing forage adoption and productivity, including access to resources and training
  • Adoption of improved forages was significantly higher in model watersheds vs. non-model ones (almost 2x more likely)
  • Training increased likelihood of forage adoption nearly tenfold
  • Key barriers included seed shortages, land pressure, and limited climate knowledge

Abstract

In Ethiopia, feed shortages driven by land scarcity and climate variability severely limit livestock productivity. Despite decades of watershed-based interventions, comparative evidence regarding their effectiveness remains limited. A cross-sectional survey of 443 households in Sidama and Central Ethiopia compared model and non-model watersheds to evaluate the effectiveness of integrated interventions on improved forage adoption within mixed crop–livestock systems. Data from household interviews, key informants and focus groups were analysed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, multiple linear regression and logistic regression. Adoption of improved forages was significantly higher in model watersheds, where farmers allocated more land and had better access to seeds, irrigation and training. Desho (Pennisetum pedicellatum) and elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum) dominated production, while overall species diversity remained low. Irrigation and training were the strongest predictors of yield, especially during the dry season, while harvesting age consistently influenced productivity. Logistic regression showed that training increased the likelihood of adoption almost tenfold, and model households were almost twice as likely to adopt compared to non-model households. Persistent barriers included seed shortages, land pressure and limited climate knowledge. Integrated institutional and ecological support is essential for initial adoption and for scaling climate-resilient practices across similar socio-economic systems.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mengistu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a323aead50b63ecad205b16https://doi.org/10.2989/10220119.2026.2659336
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1‘Unlock the Complexity’: Understanding the Economic and Political Pathways Underlying the Transition to Climate-Smart Smallholder Forage-Livestock Systems: A Case Study in Rwanda2024 · 5 citations
  2. 2Seasonality, balance and copying mechanisms of livestock feed in Northwestern Ethiopia2024 · 6 citations
  3. 3Analysis of rainfall and temperature variabilities in Sidama regional state, Ethiopia2024 · 26 citations
  4. 4Conservation and Avoided Deforestation: Evidence from Protected Areas of Tanzania2024 · 7 citations
  5. 5Developments, bottlenecks, and opportunities in seed markets for improved forages in East Africa: The case of Kenya2024 · 20 citations