PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 17, 2026Women s Studies International Forum0 citationsOpen Access

Reproductive rights and democratic backsliding in the United States and Romania: A comparison

View Full Paper
MIMihaela IvănescuLFLuiza Maria Filimon

Key Points

  • This study aims to explore the link between governmental actions that restrict reproductive rights and the process of democratic backsliding in the US and Romania.
  • Comparative analysis of governmental and non-governmental actors in the US and Romania
  • Identification of three categories of actors: governmental institutions, religious institutions, and advocacy groups
  • Examination of connections between policy positions and gendered dimensions of democratic erosion
  • Governmental and religious institutions show significant roles in promoting anti-abortion legislation, affecting women's reproductive rights.
  • Polarization driven by advocacy groups contributes to democratic backsliding, particularly through gender rights erosion.
  • Findings indicate a clear link between reproductive rights restrictions and the consolidation of illiberal politics in both nations.

Abstract

Encroachments on reproductive rights have been linked to democratic backsliding in polarized societies. This study examines how governmental and non-governmental actors advancing policy positions that aim to restrict reproductive rights are vectors of polarization that fuel democratic backsliding. In comparing the United States and Romania, the study considers democratic erosion in connection to its gendered dimension reflected in the institutionalization of pro-life stances that undermine women's reproductive rights and shape anti-abortion legislation. The analysis identifies three categories of actors – governmental institutions, religious institutions, and advocacy groups – and considers their capacity to shape policy dynamics that subvert gender rights by limiting women's autonomy and sanctioning their choices, while, at the same time, contributing to the consolidation of illiberal politics.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ivănescu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a323dd7d50b63ecad20751dhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2026.103368
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper