PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 17, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Pulsar Glitch Spin-Down Anomalies: 85 Pulsar Glitches Exhibit Statistically Significant Negative Post-Glitch Spin-Down Rate Changes

View Full Paper
BVBudinny V

Key Points

  • The aim is to identify and categorize pulsar glitches that show significant negative changes in post-glitch spin-down rates.
  • Systematic metadata analysis of Jodrell Bank pulsar glitch catalogues
  • Identified and quantified glitches with constrained post-glitch braking parameters
  • Analyzed the frequency of negative spin-down rate changes among the events
  • Out of approximately 940 glitches, 85 exhibited a negative persistent change in spin-down rate (14.1%)
  • These events are 150 times more frequent than the classic 'anti-glitch' behavior
  • New evidence categorizes these glitches as regular mechanical states of neutron star evolution rather than anomalies.

Abstract

A systematic metadata analysis of the combined Jodrell Bank pulsar glitch catalogues (Espinoza et al. 2011; Basu et al. 2022) reveals a major population of rotational events exhibiting a negative persistent change in spin-down rate (Δν̇/ν̇ < 0). Out of approximately 940 glitches with successfully constrained post-glitch braking parameters, 85 events (14.1% of 601 events with measured dF1/F1) show that the pulsar becomes permanently less braked following the event. This specific behavior is shown to be 150 times more statistically frequent than the classic "anti-glitch" (Δν/ν < 0). No previous study has systematically counted these events across the full catalogue. The 14.1% figure is novel. Because standard superfluid vortex unpinning models lack an intrinsic mechanism to decrease the external macro-torque or post-glitch braking configuration, this paper categorizes these events as a distinct, regular mechanical state of neutron star rotational evolution rather than statistical anomalies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Budinny V (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a323e9ed50b63ecad207cedhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20697779
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper