PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 1, 2002AJP Heart and Circulatory Physiology82 citations

Reduced coronary and inotropic reserves with coronary microembolization

View Full Paper
ASAndreas SkyschallyRSRainer SchulzRERaimund Erbel

Key Result

Coronary microembolization significantly blunted coronary reserve and decreased inotropic reserve from 12.4% to 8.0% (P<0.05).

Structured PICO

Does coronary microembolization reduce coronary and inotropic reserves in a canine model?

P
Population
8 anesthetized dogs subjected to experimental coronary microembolization.
I
Intervention
Repetitive injection of 42-microm microspheres (158,000 +/- 48,000) into the left circumflex coronary artery
C
Comparator
Baseline measurements prior to microembolization
O
Outcome
Coronary reserve (via adenosine infusion or reactive hyperemia) and inotropic reserve (via dobutamine infusion)surrogate

Coronary microembolization significantly reduces both coronary and inotropic reserves despite unchanged resting blood flow in a canine model.

Main Result

p-value: p=<0.05

Abstract

Microembolized myocardium is characterized by perfusion-contraction mismatch with reduced contractile function and unchanged or even elevated blood flow. The present study investigated the consequences of microembolization on coronary and inotropic reserves. In eight anesthetized dogs, left circumflex coronary blood flow (CBF), regional blood flow (RBF), and posterior systolic wall thickening were measured. Repetitive injection of 42-microm microspheres into the left circumflex coronary artery decreased systolic wall thickening by 50% (17.2 +/- 2.4% vs. 8.0 +/- 1.4%; means +/- SD). Coronary reserve was determined by either intracoronary infusion of adenosine (n = 4) or the reactive hyperemia response following 15 s of coronary occlusion (n = 4); inotropic reserve was recruited by intracoronary infusion of dobutamine. The amount of injected microspheres was 158,000 +/- 48,000. CBF (45.5 +/- 16.5 vs. 47.8 +/- 14.4 ml/min) and RBF (1.15 +/- 0.18 vs. 1.33 +/- 0.39 ml x min(-1) x g(-1)) remained unchanged. Coronary reserve in response to intracoronary infusion of adenosine (410 +/- 94% vs. 290 +/- 77%; P < 0.05) and reactive hyperemia repayment (360 +/- 174% vs. 155 +/- 66%; P < 0.05) were blunted after microembolization. Inotropic reserve, i.e., the increment in systolic wall thickening with dobutamine, was decreased from 12.4 +/- 3.9% to 8.0 +/- 3.3% (P < 0.05). We conclude that coronary microembolization reduces coronary and inotropic reserves.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Skyschally et al. (2002) studied Coronary microembolization (n=8). Coronary microembolization vs. Baseline (before microembolization) was evaluated on Coronary reserve (response to adenosine or reactive hyperemia) and inotropic reserve (p=<0.05). Coronary microembolization significantly blunted coronary reserve and decreased inotropic reserve from 12.4% to 8.0% (P<0.05).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a32810281ec1bb6b0ddef06https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00797.2001
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper