PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 29, 2025Environmental Impact Assessment Review5 citationsOpen Access

Quantifying environmental benefits of monomaterial transition in flexible packaging applications

View Full Paper
RSRoberta StefaniniGVGiuseppe Vignali

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The increasing use of plastic packaging has raised environmental concerns for their disposal. A barrier to recyclability is the popularity of multilayer solutions, consisting of different polymer films, with high-performance barrier, but with almost no material separability. Since circular economy calls for the design for recycling, a strategy is the reduction of structural complexity, favouring single-material configurations that can be processed in mechanical recycling streams. In this context, this work aims at quantifying the environmental benefits potentially associated to the substitution of multi-material food packaging with recyclable ones. Three types of products have been selected as case studies: coffee (1 kg), dried fruit (200 g), cheese (200 g). Through Life Cycle Assessments (LCA), their conventional packaging configuration composed of polyethene terephthalate (PET), polyethylene (PE), aluminium, in complex multilayers, were compared with alternatives based primarily on polypropylene (PP) or polyethylene derivatives. Primary data on packaging composition, production process, transports, auxiliary materials were collected, supplemented by secondary data from Ecoinvent database. Attention was paid to end of lives, modelled using national consortium reports and RecyClass European tool. Results shows that material choice and production influence packaging environmental impacts, with monomaterials generally performing better in gas emissions and eutrophication, while in resource- and water-related impacts show no clear advantage. End-of-life management is crucial, as proper recycling of monomaterials can significantly enhance sustainability, highlighting the need for consumer awareness and careful evaluation of trade-offs by manufactures. Since results depend on context and material, requiring case-by-case evaluation, future research need to expand products coverage. • Multilayer and monomaterial packaging are environmentally compared • Six Life Cycle Assessment of packaging for cheese, dry fruits and coffee • Monomaterial films showed lower global warming potential than multilayers • Trade-offs emerge in other categories: materials choice affect packaging impacts • Insight for food industry stakeholders to develop more sustainable packaging

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Stefanini et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a32ae30cf42d9fde8ddf27chttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108321
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Impact of recyclate quality and functional barrier layers on the performance of LDPE in food packaging2025 · 3 citations
  2. 2Packaging's Role in Minimizing Food Loss and Waste Across the Supply Chain2015 · 386 citations
  3. 3Life cycle assessment of two baby food packaging alternatives: glass jars vs. plastic pots2009 · 217 citations
  4. 4Testing a coated PE-based mono-material for food packaging applications: an in-depth performance comparison with conventional multi-layer configurations2023 · 53 citations
  5. 5Progress on the layer-by-layer assembly of multilayered polymer composites: Strategy, structural control and applications2018 · 326 citations