PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2013Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance89 citationsOpen Access

Impact of cardiovascular magnetic resonance on management and clinical decision-making in heart failure patients

SASiddique AbbasiAEAndrew ErtelRSRavi V. Shah

Key Result

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging led to a new diagnosis or change in management in 65% of heart failure patients, with late gadolinium enhancement being a strong independent predictor of clinical impact (OR 6.72).

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=150)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does cardiovascular magnetic resonance improve clinical management and diagnosis in patients with heart failure and LVEF ≤ 50%?

P
Population
150 consecutive patients with heart failure and an ejection fraction ≤50% referred for cardiovascular magnetic resonance at a single academic center.
E
Exposure
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR)
O
Outcome
Significant clinical impact (defined as new diagnosis, medication change, hospital admission/discharge, or performance/avoidance of invasive procedures)

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance significantly impacts clinical management and diagnosis in the majority of heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction, particularly when late gadolinium enhancement is present.

Limitations

  • Small sample size drawn from a single academic tertiary center, leading to potential selection bias
  • Not designed to test the validity of the management decisions or new diagnoses on patient outcomes
  • Patient treatment was entirely at the discretion of the patient's cardiologist
  • Did not analyze cost-effectiveness of CMR compared to current testing

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) can provide important diagnostic and prognostic information in patients with heart failure. However, in the current health care environment, use of a new imaging modality like CMR requires evidence for direct additive impact on clinical management. We sought to evaluate the impact of CMR on clinical management and diagnosis in patients with heart failure. METHODS: We prospectively studied 150 consecutive patients with heart failure and an ejection fraction ≤ 50% referred for CMR. Definitions for "significant clinical impact" of CMR were pre-defined and collected directly from medical records and/or from patients. Categories of significant clinical impact included: new diagnosis, medication change, hospital admission/discharge, as well as performance or avoidance of invasive procedures (angiography, revascularization, device therapy or biopsy). RESULTS: Overall, CMR had a significant clinical impact in 65% of patients. This included an entirely new diagnosis in 30% of cases and a change in management in 52%. CMR results directly led to angiography in 9% and to the performance of percutaneous coronary intervention in 7%. In a multivariable model that included clinical and imaging parameters, presence of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was the only independent predictor of "significant clinical impact" (OR 6.72, 95% CI 2.56-17.60, p=0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: CMR made a significant additive clinical impact on management, decision-making and diagnosis in 65% of heart failure patients. This additive impact was seen despite universal use of prior echocardiography in this patient group. The presence of LGE was the best independent predictor of significant clinical impact following CMR.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Abbasi et al. (2013) conducted an observational in Heart failure (n=150). Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) was evaluated on Significant clinical impact (new diagnosis or change in management). Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging led to a new diagnosis or change in management in 65% of heart failure patients, with late gadolinium enhancement being a strong independent predictor of clinical impact (OR 6.72).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a330166c832e26dfd08bf98https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429x-15-89
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper