PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 19, 2016Thrombosis and Haemostasis261 citationsOpen Access

Real-world comparison of major bleeding risk among non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients initiated on apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin

View Full Paper
AKAllison KeshishianSKShital KambleXPXianying Pan

Key Result

Initiation of apixaban (HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.39-0.71) or dabigatran (HR 0.69; 95% CI 0.50-0.96) was associated with a significantly lower risk of major bleeding compared to warfarin in NVAF patients.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=45,361)

Structured PICO

Do NOACs (apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban) reduce major bleeding compared to warfarin in newly anticoagulated NVAF patients?

P
Population
45,361 patients aged ≥18 years with non-valvular atrial fibrillation newly prescribed an oral anticoagulant, evaluated using a US claims database.
E
Exposure
Initiation of apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban
C
Comparator
Initiation of warfarin (propensity score matched)
O
Outcome
Major bleeding (defined as bleeding requiring hospitalisation)safety

In a real-world setting of newly anticoagulated NVAF patients, apixaban and dabigatran were associated with a significantly lower risk of major bleeding compared to warfarin, whereas rivaroxaban was not.

Main Result

Hazard Ratio: 0.53 (95% CI 0.39–0.71)

Abstract

Summary In addition to warfarin, there are four non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) available for stroke prevention in non valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). There are limited data on the comparative risks of major bleeding among newly anticoagulated NVAF patients who initiate warfarin, apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban, when used in ‘real world’ clinical practice. The study used the Truven MarketScan® Commercial 95 % CI: 0.39–0.71) and dabigatran (HR: 0.69; 95 % CI: 0.50–0.96) initiators had a significantly lower risk of major bleeding. Patients initiating rivaroxaban (HR: 0.98; 95 % CI: 0.83–1.17) had a non-significant difference in major bleeding risk compared to matched warfarin patients. When comparisons were made between NOACs, matched rivaroxaban patients had a significantly higher risk of major bleeding (HR: 1.82; 95 % CI: 1.36–2.43) compared to apixaban patients. The differences for apixaban-dabigatran and dabigatran-rivaroxaban matched cohorts were not statistically significant. Among newly anticoagulated NVAF patients in the real-world setting, apixaban and dabigatran initiation was associated with significantly lower risk of major bleeding compared to warfarin initiation. When compared to apixaban, rivaroxaban initiation was associated with significantly higher risk of major bleeding. Note: The review process for this paper was fully handled by Christian Weber, Editor in Chief. Supplementary Material to this article is available online at www.thrombosis-online.com.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Keshishian et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) (n=45,361). Apixaban vs. Warfarin was evaluated on Major bleeding requiring hospitalisation (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.39-0.71). Initiation of apixaban (HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.39-0.71) or dabigatran (HR 0.69; 95% CI 0.50-0.96) was associated with a significantly lower risk of major bleeding compared to warfarin in NVAF patients.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a33034f58530ca2eee12243https://doi.org/10.1160/th16-05-0403
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper