PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 21, 2023Journal of sport and health science/Journal of Sport and Health Science31 citationsOpen Access

Acute effect of foot strike patterns on in vivo tibiotalar and subtalar joint kinematics during barefoot running

DYDongqiang YeLLLu LiSZShen Zhang

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Foot kinematics, such as excessive eversion and malalignment of the hindfoot, are believed to be associated with running-related injuries. The majority of studies to date show that different foot strike patterns influence these specific foot and ankle kinematics. However, technical deficiencies in traditional motion capture approaches limit knowledge of in vivo joint kinematics with respect to rearfoot and forefoot strike patterns (RFS and FFS, respectively). This study uses a high-speed dual fluoroscopic imaging system (DFIS) to determine the effects of different foot strike patterns on 3D in vivo tibiotalar and subtalar joints kinematics. METHODS: Fifteen healthy male recreational runners underwent foot computed tomography scanning for the construction of 3-dimensional models. A high-speed DFIS (100 Hz) was used to collect 6 degrees of freedom kinematics for participants' tibiotalar and subtalar joints when they adopted RFS and FFS in barefoot condition. RESULTS: Compared with RFS, FFS exhibited greater internal rotation at 0%-20% of the stance phase in the tibiotalar joint. The peak internal rotation angle of the tibiotalar joint under FFS was greater than under RFS (p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 0.92). RFS showed more dorsiflexion at 0%-20% of the stance phase in the tibiotalar joint than FFS. RFS also presented a larger anterior translation (p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 1.28) in the subtalar joint at initial contact than FFS. CONCLUSION: Running with acute barefoot FFS increases the internal rotation of the tibiotalar joint in the early stance. The use of high-speed DFIS to quantify the movement of the tibiotalar and subtalar joint was critical to revealing the effects of RFS and FFS during running.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ye et al. (2023) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a3374db3b8943b2b5198eb3https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2023.05.002
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Biomechanical and physiological comparison of barefoot and two shod conditions in experienced barefoot runners.2009 · 397 citations
  2. 2Kinematic Analysis of Runners with Achilles Mid-Portion Tendinopathy2009 · 109 citations
  3. 3Invasive in vivo measurement of rear-, mid- and forefoot motion during walking2007 · 323 citations
  4. 4Normative rearfoot motion during barefoot and shod walking using biplane fluoroscopy2014 · 51 citations
  5. 5Foot Strike and Injury Rates in Endurance Runners2012 · 498 citations