PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 2, 2018Annals of Internal Medicine71 citations

Comparison of Five Major Guidelines for Statin Use in Primary Prevention in a Contemporary General Population

View Full Paper
MMMartin Bødtker MortensenBNBørge G. Nordestgaard

Key Result

Applying the CCS and ACC/AHA guidelines for primary prevention of ASCVD was estimated to prevent 34% of events over 10 years, compared with 32% for NICE, 27% for USPSTF, and 13% for ESC/EAS.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=45,750)

Structured PICO

How do five major guidelines for statin use in primary prevention compare in terms of eligibility and estimated ASCVD events prevented in a contemporary general population?

P
Population
45,750 Danish adults aged 40 to 75 years without baseline ASCVD or statin use, followed for 10 years to estimate the effectiveness of different statin guidelines.
E
Exposure
Statin eligibility according to five major guidelines (CCS, ACC/AHA, NICE, USPSTF, ESC/EAS)
C
Comparator
Comparison among the five guidelines
O
Outcome
Number of participants eligible to use statins and estimated number of ASCVD events that statins could have prevented over 10 yearscomposite

Guidelines recommending broader statin eligibility for primary prevention (like CCS and ACC/AHA) are estimated to prevent more ASCVD events than more restrictive guidelines (like ESC/EAS).

Limitations

  • This study was limited to primary prevention in white Europeans.

Abstract

Background: Five major organizations recently published guidelines for using statins to prevent atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD): in 2013, the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA); in 2014, the United Kingdom's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); and in 2016, the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS), the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), and the European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society (ESC/EAS). Objective: To compare the utility of these guidelines for primary prevention of ASCVD. Design: Observational study of actual ASCVD events during 10 years, followed by a modeling study to estimate the effectiveness of different guidelines. Setting: The Copenhagen General Population Study. Participants: 45 750 Danish persons aged 40 to 75 years who did not use statins and did not have ASCVD at baseline. Measurements: The number of participants eligible to use statins according to each guideline and the estimated number of ASCVD events that statins could have prevented. Results: The percentage of participants eligible for statins was 44% by the CCS guideline, 42% by ACC/AHA, 40% by NICE, 31% by USPSTF, and 15% by ESC/EAS. The estimated percentage of ASCVD events that could have been prevented by using statins for 10 years was 34% for CCS, 34% for ACC/AHA, 32% for NICE, 27% for USPSTF, and 13% for ESC/EAS. Limitation: This study was limited to primary prevention in white Europeans. Conclusion: Guidelines recommending that more persons use statins for primary prevention of ASCVD should prevent more events than guidelines recommending use by fewer persons. Primary Funding Source: Copenhagen University Hospital.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mortensen et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) (n=45,750). Statin eligibility guidelines (CCS, ACC/AHA, NICE, USPSTF, ESC/EAS) was evaluated on Estimated percentage of ASCVD events that could have been prevented by using statins for 10 years. Applying the CCS and ACC/AHA guidelines for primary prevention of ASCVD was estimated to prevent 34% of events over 10 years, compared with 32% for NICE, 27% for USPSTF, and 13% for ESC/EAS.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a33bd96dd6c83ee7b19e548https://doi.org/10.7326/m17-0681
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper