PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 18, 2026Cardiovascular Innovations and Applications0 citationsOpen Access

Socioeconomic, Lifestyle, and Clinical Factors Associated with Cardiovascular Events in the U.S. Cancer Population

View Full Paper
ASAo ShiYLYixiao LuJSJianfeng Shi

Key Result

Socioeconomic factors like lack of private insurance, food insecurity, and low education were independently associated with prevalent cardiovascular disease specifically among cancer survivors.

Key Points

  • This study aims to explore the associations between socioeconomic, lifestyle, and clinical factors with cardiovascular disease in cancer survivors compared to a non-cancer cohort.
  • Analyzed data from 97,648 adults in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
  • Used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate associations with a composite endpoint of five cardiovascular events.
  • Conducted sensitivity analyses for individual cardiovascular outcomes.
  • Included 5,584 cancer survivors and 9,933 matched non-cancer participants.
  • Age, sex, unemployment, low income, smoking, obesity, diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia were linked to higher odds of cardiovascular disease.
  • Among cancer survivors, lack of private insurance, food insecurity, and low educational attainment were also significant risk factors.

Study Design

Type

Cross-Sectional (n=15,517)

Structured PICO

Are socioeconomic, lifestyle, and clinical factors associated with prevalent cardiovascular events in adult cancer survivors compared to a matched non-cancer cohort?

P
Population
15,517 adults from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, including 5,584 cancer survivors and 9,933 matched participants without cancer.
E
Exposure
Socioeconomic, lifestyle, and clinical factors (observational exposure)
C
Comparator
Matched participants without cancer
O
Outcome
Composite endpoint of five self-reported cardiovascular events (prevalent CVD)composite

Socioeconomic disadvantages, including lack of private insurance and food insecurity, are independently associated with prevalent cardiovascular disease in cancer survivors, highlighting the need to address social determinants of health in cardio-oncology.

Limitations

  • Outcomes were self-reported
  • Study was cross-sectional
  • Findings should be interpreted as associative rather than causal or predictive
  • Cross-sectional design (associative rather than causal or predictive)

Abstract

Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of mortality among cancer survivors, yet the contributions of socioeconomic, lifestyle, and clinical factors to CVD remain unexplored. Objective: This study was aimed at examining associations between these factors and prevalent CVD in adults with prior cancer and comparing them with those in a matched non-cancer cohort. Methods: We analyzed 97,648 adults from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Associations of socioeconomic, lifestyle, and clinical factors with a composite endpoint of five self-reported cardiovascular events were assessed with multivariable logistic regression. Interaction analyses assessed differences by cancer status, and sensitivity analyses examined individual cardiovascular outcomes. Results: We included 5584 cancer survivors and 9933 matched participants without cancer. Age, sex, unemployment, low income, current smoking, obesity, diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia were associated with elevated odds of CVD prevalence in both groups. Among only cancer survivors, an absence of private insurance, or the presence of food insecurity or low educational attainment, was also independently associated with CVD prevalence. Sensitivity analyses indicated broadly consistent results across individual outcomes. Conclusions: Socioeconomic, lifestyle, and clinical factors were associated with prevalent CVD among cancer survivors, with socioeconomic disadvantage contributing to disparities in CVD burden. Because the outcomes were self-reported, and the study was cross-sectional, the findings should be interpreted as associative rather than causal or predictive.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shi et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Prior cancer (n=15,517). Socioeconomic, lifestyle, and clinical factors vs. Absence of risk factors / Matched non-cancer cohort was evaluated on Composite endpoint of five self-reported cardiovascular events. Socioeconomic factors like lack of private insurance, food insecurity, and low education were independently associated with prevalent cardiovascular disease specifically among cancer survivors.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a33cfcf14a9c556e66778dbhttps://doi.org/10.15212/cvia.2026.0016
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper