PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 19, 2026Computers in Biology and Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

Flow characteristics in a nasal to tracheo-bronchial airway using a scale resolving simulation

View Full Paper
PWPatrick Warfield-McAlpineJEJake EmmerlingDFDavid F. Fletcher

Key Points

  • To characterize airflow dynamics from the nasal cavity to the distal bronchioles during steady inhalation.
  • Employed a patient-specific respiratory model based on CT scans.
  • Used a hybrid stress-blended eddy simulation model for flow analysis.
  • Applied dynamic mode decomposition and spectral analysis for dominant flow characterization.
  • Laminar-dominant flow in the nasal cavity at speeds of 6.2-8.4 m/s, with high-velocity jets up to 14.9 m/s in the larynx.
  • Resolved turbulence kinetic energy reached 35 m²/s², indicating areas of high unsteadiness.
  • Asymmetric flow distribution in bronchial branches showed 44.65% and 55.35% partitioning.

Abstract

Background and Objective Airflow dynamics are fundamental to understanding respiratory function, yet the complexity of flow regimes within the nasal and tracheo-bronchial pathways remains poorly characterised. This study employed a patient-specific respiratory model, extending from the nasal cavity to the 7 th -generation bronchioles, to investigate airflow characteristics at a steady inhalation rate of 30 L/min. Methods A hybrid Stress-Blended Eddy Simulation (SBES) model was used to capture unsteady flow structures, while Dynamic Mode Decomposition (DMD) and spectral analysis were applied to identify dominant flow dynamics. The computational model, derived from CT scans, used a poly-hexcore mesh with ∼ 30 million cells. This study provides a unified, scale-resolving characterisation of airflow from the nasal cavity to distal bronchioles, linking flow behaviour across regions using modal and spectral diagnostics. Results The results revealed laminar-dominant flow in the nasal cavity, with velocities increasing to 6.2–8.4 m/s, and high-velocity jet formation in the laryngeal region with peak velocities of up to 14.9 m/s. This region exhibited enhanced unsteadiness and strong oscillatory behaviour, with resolved turbulence kinetic energy reaching up to 35 m 2 /s 2 . Downstream, flow progressively transitioned toward laminar-dominant conditions in distal bronchioles, with reduced velocity (0.8–3.6 m/s) and low energy content. Coherent structures identified via the q -criterion and DMD highlighted regions of energy redistribution and high-frequency oscillations. Flow partitioning between left and right bronchial branches showed asymmetry, with total distributions of 44.65% and 55.35%, respectively. Conclusions This study provides a unified characterisation of airflow dynamics across the upper and lower airways, identifying key regions of enhanced unsteadiness and downstream energy dissipation, with implications for respiratory modelling and device design.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Warfield-McAlpine et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a34dc5265a5b0777af2c8e7https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2026.111805
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper