PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 19, 2026Globalizations3 citationsOpen Access

Structural power redux: geoeconomic rivalry in a networked world

View Full Paper
SRSteve RolfTZTim ZajontzSSSeth Schindler

Key Points

  • The paper examines how US and Chinese structural power is shaped by networked globalization and geographical competition.
  • Historicizes US structural power in the neoliberal era.
  • Theorizes the integration of transnational networks and their impact on superpower rivalry.
  • Introduces case studies on Sino-centric infrastructure and US investments in critical minerals.
  • China's LOGINK initiative merges infrastructure and digital networks in port development.
  • The US focuses on the Lobito Corridor for critical minerals and infrastructure investment.
  • Both nations aim to create dependencies through strategic network bundling.

Abstract

The US and China are locked in a spiralling geopolitical competition to renegotiate globalization. This competition centres on establishing control over the transnational financial, infrastructure, digital and production networks that have taken shape after the Cold War. We historicize how US structural power became ‘networked’ in the neoliberal era, and theorize how these networks shape current superpower competition. We contend that contemporary structural power flows from the integration of transnational networks. Infrastructure is paramount within US and Chinese global strategies, but it is increasingly bundled with investments in digital and production networks, supported by exclusionary financing. We introduce two examples of ‘network bundling’. China fuses Sino-centric port infrastructure and digital networks by expanding the use of LOGINK. Along the Lobito Corridor, the US steers infrastructure investments in attempts to reconfigure critical minerals value chains. Through bundling, superpowers aspire to leverage power across networks and to lock third countries into new dependencies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rolf et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a34dc9f65a5b0777af2cac7https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2026.2675839
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper