PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 19, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Empowering early-career researchers for science-policy engagement in biodiversity conservation

View Full Paper
DLDechen LhamJJJeanine (author) JanzDZDebra Zuppinger-Dingley

Key Points

  • The report aims to enhance science-policy engagement for early-career researchers in biodiversity conservation.
  • Two-day capacity-building workshop with 20 doctoral and postdoctoral researchers.
  • Collaboration with 13 experts from academia, government, and boundary organizations.
  • Discussions and practical exercises to identify key components of engagement strategies.
  • Five key components of engagement: understanding position, analyzing policy environment, defining objectives, building networks, and reflecting on success.
  • Emphasis on context-specific, strategic, and adaptive approaches rather than standardized solutions.
  • Call for increased institutional support through training, mentorship, and incentives for effective engagement.

Abstract

Biodiversity loss is a central dimension of the triple planetary crisis and underscores the need for stronger science-policy engagement to support transformative change. Early-career researchers (ECRs) can make important contributions at the biodiversity science-policy interface but often face barriers, including limited training, networks, time, resources, and institutional recognition. This Brief Report draws on insights from a two-day capacity-building workshop that brought together 20 doctoral and postdoctoral researchers from Swiss institutions and 13 experts from academia, government, and boundary organizations. The workshop aimed to strengthen participants’ understanding of science-policy processes in biodiversity conservation and to support the development of tailored engagement strategies. Based on workshop discussions, practical exercises, and expert exchange, we identify five key components of effective science-policy engagement for ECRs: understanding one’s position, analyzing the policy environment, defining engagement objectives, building networks, and reflecting on success. We argue that science-policy engagement is context-specific and requires strategic, adaptive, and sustained approaches rather than standardized solutions. Strengthening institutional support through training, mentorship, and appropriate incentives is essential to enable ECRs to engage meaningfully in biodiversity governance. Supporting ECRs at the science-policy interface can enhance both their professional development and the contribution of research to biodiversity conservation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lham et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a34dd1d65a5b0777af2cf97https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-434550
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Empowering early-career researchers for science-policy engagement in biodiversity conservation2026
  2. 2Navigating the science policy interface: a co-created mind-map to support early career research contributions to policy-relevant evidence2024 · 2 citations
  3. 3Co-envisioning an academia that fully embraces and supports early career researchers in interdisciplinary social-ecological research2026
  4. 4Reevaluating new and existing challenges early career researchers face across regulatory ecotoxicology2026
  5. 5From frontier research to biodiversity conservation and restoration policies2024