PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 19, 2026Remote Sensing0 citationsOpen Access

Dynamic Three-Dimensional Zoning of Ecosystem Service Interactions Under Future Land-Use Scenarios: A Songnen Plain Case Study

View Full Paper
SYSisi YuZTZhanzhong TangLYLi Yang

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess and spatially zone ecosystem service interactions under various future land-use scenarios.
  • Applied a novel intensity–trend–stability framework for analysis.
  • Utilized multi-scale analysis and four contrasting land-use scenarios for 2030.
  • Employed an XGBoost–SHAP model to identify key drivers of ecosystem service interactions.
  • Land-use transitions demonstrate strong scenario dependency under different development pathways.
  • Water yield shows trade-offs with other ecosystem services, while soil retention, carbon sequestration, and habitat quality maintain stable synergies.
  • The framework identifies stable conflict zones and synergistic hotspots, with specific interaction zones covering significant areas of the study.

Abstract

Dynamic trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services (ESs) are highly sensitive to land-use change, spatial scale, and future uncertainty. However, most ES-based zoning studies rely on static assessments that overlook temporal dynamics and scenario robustness. To address this limitation, we propose a novel intensity–trend–stability framework that integrates historical interaction strength, projected future trajectories, and cross-scenario consistency to assess and spatially zone ES interactions. The framework was applied to the Songnen Plain, China, using multi-scale analysis and four contrasting land-use scenarios for 2030. An XGBoost–SHAP model was further employed to identify key drivers and nonlinear effects underlying ES interaction dynamics. Results show that (1) land-use transitions exhibit strong scenario dependency under different development pathways. (2) Water yield consistently exhibits trade-offs with other ESs, whereas soil retention, carbon sequestration, and habitat quality maintain stable synergies, with interaction intensity generally weakening at coarser scales. (3) The proposed framework effectively identifies stable conflict zones, synergistic hotspots, and transitional areas, with HHH zones of water-related interactions accounting for 30.72–37.43% of the study area, while LLH zones of other ES pairs each occupy more than 39%. (4) Climatic and topographic factors primarily regulate water-related interactions, whereas vegetation conditions and landscape configuration dominate synergistic ES relationships, with pronounced nonlinear threshold effects. The proposed framework improves the detection of dynamic ES interaction patterns and supports scenario-based ecological zoning and sustainable land-use management.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a34de1265a5b0777af2d9fbhttps://doi.org/10.3390/rs18122014
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1County zoning and optimization paths for trade-offs and synergies of ecosystem services in Northeast China2024 · 29 citations
  2. 2Multiscale characteristics of ecosystem service value trade-offs/synergies and their response to landscape pattern evolution in a typical karst basin in southern China2024 · 42 citations
  3. 3Linking scale-dependent ecosystem service interactions with driver-based zoning strategies: A case study of the Songnen Plain2026 · 3 citations
  4. 4Recognizing trade‐offs in multi‐objective land management2011 · 411 citations
  5. 5Geochemical assessment of agricultural soil: A case study in Songnen-Plain (Northeastern China)2013 · 40 citations