PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 19, 2026Sustainability0 citationsOpen Access

The Evolution and Driving Factors of China’s Green Technology Transfer Network

View Full Paper
YYYuanchun YuYHYuanjian Han

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore the evolution and driving factors of China’s green technology transfer network from 2010 to 2022.
  • Analyzed data from 297 prefecture-level cities in China spanning 2010-2022.
  • Utilized a directed weighted network model and various analytical methods including social network analysis and QAP regression.
  • Examined spatial structural evolution, node topology characteristics, and identified driving factors.
  • The number of nodes in the network grew from 249 to 292, and network coverage increased from 83.8% to 98.3%.
  • Network density and average degree significantly rose, showing enhanced connectivity across regions.
  • Key drivers of network evolution identified include the digital economy and geographic location.

Abstract

Using a sample of 297 prefecture-level cities in China from 2010 to 2022 and drawing on green patent transfer data, this study constructs a directed weighted network and applies social network analysis, a modified gravity model, and quadratic assignment procedure (QAP) regression to examine the spatial structural evolution, node topology characteristics, and driving factors of China’s green technology transfer (GTT) network. The results show that: (1) From 2010 to 2022, the number of nodes grew from 249 to 292, network coverage increased from 83.8% to 98.3%, and the number of edges expanded by a factor of 14.47. Network density and average degree also rose markedly. The spatial structure evolved from an initially sparse and fragmented configuration into a polycentric complex network centered on the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region, the Yangtze River Delta, and the Chengdu–Chongqing economic circle. (2) In terms of node topology, the intermediary and control capacities of cities exhibit dynamic changes, with central and western cities gaining growing influence within the network. (3) Cohesive subgroup analysis identifies four functional blocks, revealing a multi-level technology spillover path of “core—secondary—regional—peripheral.” (4) QAP regression further identifies the digital economy, geographic location, high-speed rail mileage, industrial structure, and government environmental concern as key drivers of network formation and evolution. This study offers a new perspective on understanding cross-regional green technology transfer and provides theoretical grounding and policy references for promoting regional collaborative innovation and green low-carbon development.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a34de4165a5b0777af2dae2https://doi.org/10.3390/su18126218
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper