PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 19, 2026Analytics0 citationsOpen Access

Configuration-Aware Bayesian Shelf Inference for Mobile RFID Library Inventory

View Full Paper
SMSherzod MukhammadjonovMRMarat RakhmatullayevHBHusniya Boysunova

Key Points

  • This research aims to develop a framework for enhancing robot-assisted RFID inventory management in libraries under uncertain conditions.
  • Developed a framework with three phases: converting logs into atomic events, performing map-constrained Bayesian inference, and analyzing proxy review workload.
  • Used the public RFID Location dataset with 688,073 aligned observations for evaluation.
  • Evaluated run dependence on inventory performance using posterior spread and convergence rates.
  • Best run achieved a mean posterior spread of 0.906 m and a convergence rate of 0.553.
  • Degraded run attained a mean spread above 2.1 m with a lower convergence of 0.004.
  • Adding phase information significantly improved posterior concentration relative to RSSI-only baselines.

Abstract

Mobile RFID inventory in libraries must be planned and evaluated under noisy observations, configuration-dependent read regimes, and incomplete supervision. This paper presents an uncertainty-aware analytics framework for robot-assisted RFID inventory using the public RFID Location dataset. The framework has three phases. Phase 1 converts irregular list-encoded logs into atomic RFID events and quantifies how operating configuration changes read density and signal variability. Phase 2 performs map-constrained Bayesian shelf inference by synchronizing RFID reads with robot trajectory and antenna geometry and by fusing RSSI and carrier phase over feasible shelf candidates. Phase 3 translates posterior spread and non-convergence into proxy review workload and cost, enabling configuration comparison and certainty–throughput trade-off analysis when strict EPC-to-item linkage is unavailable. Across 688,073 aligned RFID observations, the pipeline produces 18,190 posterior tag estimates from five inventory runs. The empirical results show strong run dependence: the best run achieves a mean posterior spread of 0.906 m with a convergence rate of 0.553, whereas a degraded run reaches only 0.004 convergence with a mean spread above 2.1 m. Because EPC-to-item linkage is unavailable, these values are posterior concentration and workload indicators rather than ground-truthed localization-accuracy metrics. A saved phase-weight ablation further shows that adding phase information substantially sharpens posterior concentration relative to an RSSI-only baseline. Under the proxy workload model, autonomous-S1-P30 provides the most favorable balance among posterior certainty, scan effort, and implied review burden.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mukhammadjonov et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a34df2365a5b0777af2e462https://doi.org/10.3390/analytics5020019
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper