PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 19, 2026Australian Energy Producers journal.0 citations

Session 3. Oral Presentation for: Cross-border CO2 transportation policy readiness: positioning Australia in the global CCS market

View Full Paper
HNHaotian Ni

Key Points

  • Assess the readiness of Australia’s policies for cross-border carbon capture and storage (CCS) relative to regional peers.
  • Developed a five-dimensional framework evaluating CCS policies based on five parameters: domestic ecosystem strength, regulatory harmony, operational guidelines, stakeholder engagement, and enabling finance.
  • Scored each parameter over 12 sub-parameters on a scale of 0–4 to compare Australia with Malaysia and Indonesia.
  • Evaluated Australia’s CCS position against European peers, focusing on various regulatory aspects.
  • Australia scored 2.5, indicating competitive advantages in storage regulations and London Protocol readiness compared to Malaysia (1.25) and Indonesia (1.3).
  • Identified significant gaps in emissions accounting for leakage, dispute resolution, and technical specifications for CO2 relative to European standards.
  • Recommended Australia focus on bilateral agreements with Japan, South Korea, and Singapore to enhance CCS leadership in the region.

Abstract

Presented on 19 May 2026: Session 3 Cross-border carbon capture and storage (CCS) is essential for decarbonising the world’s and Asia-Pacific’s (APAC) industrial emissions. Globally, Europe and APAC indicate a high potential for cross-border transport with a forecast of 127 mtpa cross-border opportunity by 2035. Yet beyond geological advantages, successful cross-border CCS also requires coordinated policy frameworks and regulatory harmony. This paper presents a five-dimensional framework assessing cross-border CCS policies: domestic ecosystem strength, regulatory harmony, operational guidelines, stakeholder engagement, and enabling finance. These five parameters are scored over 12 sub-parameters on a scale of 0–4. Comparison with regional peers Malaysia (1.25) and Indonesia (1.3) reveals Australia’s (2.5) competitive advantages in storage regulations and London Protocol readiness. However, significant gaps remain compared to European peers, particularly in emissions accounting for leakage, dispute resolution, and technical specifications for CO2. To secure its position as regional leader in the space, Australia must accelerate bilateral agreement negotiations with Japan, South Korea, and Singapore; clarify emissions credit treatment for imported CO2; and champion regional coordination mechanisms. To access the Oral Presentation click ‘Supplementary data’ below. To read the full paper click here

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Haotian Ni (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a34df4a65a5b0777af2e6d9https://doi.org/10.1071/ep26508
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper