PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 19, 2026Blood Advances0 citationsOpen Access

KIT mutation and AHN-associated oncogenic profiles in systemic mastocytosis with an associated hematological neoplasm

View Full Paper
PNPaula Navarro‐NavarroCFCarlos FernándezAGAndrés C. García‐Montero

Key Points

  • This analysis investigates the coexistence and clinical implications of KIT mutations and AHN-related genetic alterations in systemic mastocytosis patients.
  • Included 79 systemic mastocytosis patients classified based on genetic alteration patterns.
  • Analyzed the presence of KIT mutations and AHN-related alterations in bone marrow mast cells and hematological neoplasm cells.
  • Investigated clinical manifestations and survival outcomes based on genetic profiles.
  • 27% of patients displayed unrelated genetic alterations in bone marrow mast cells and AHN cells.
  • Patients with shared KIT mutations showed more advanced disease and shorter progression-free survival (PFS).
  • Those with genetically unrelated SM and AHN had better clinical outcomes and prolonged PFS.

Abstract

In 5-15% of systemic mastocytosis (SM) patients, SM coexists with another associated hematological neoplasm (AHN). Most SM-AHN patients harbor a KIT-mutation, mainly KIT p.D816V, together with other AHN-related genetic alterations; however, limited data exists about the frequency and the clinical impact of the coexistence of both types of genetic alterations in the same vs. distinct bone marrow (BM) cell compartments. Here we analyzed 79 SM-AHN patients classified into cases who: i) displayed distinct unrelated genetic alterations in BM mast cells (MC) and AHN cells (21/79, 27%); ii) shared the KIT-mutation as a first genetic event (24/79, 30%) involving both BM MC and AHN cells, together with or without AHN-associated alterations restricted to the latter cells; iii) patients presenting with AHN-associated alterations as a first event (25/79, 32%) present in both BM MC and AHN cells, and; iv) patients in whom both alterations involved virtually all SM and AHN cells (9/79, 11%). Overall, patients with genetically unrelated SM and AHN more frequently showed clinical manifestations associated with SM (ie. anaphylaxis, osteoporosis and skin lesions) together with prolonged progression-free survival (PFS), while those cases with shared genetic alterations displayed signs of more advanced disease (ie. cytopenias or organomegalies) and shorter PFS and overall survival. Our findings confirm the clinical, genetic and prognostic heterogeneity of SM-AHN and point out its association with the underlying oncogenic profile of neoplastic MC and AHN cells.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Navarro‐Navarro et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a34dfa365a5b0777af2ea9chttps://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2025018389
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of aneuploidization patterns in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance versus multiple myeloma and plasma cell leukemia2003 · 42 citations
  2. 2Significance of systemic mast cell disease with associated hematologic disorders1988 · 232 citations
  3. 3Incidence of numerical chromosome aberrations in meningioma tumors as revealed by fluorescence in situ hybridization using 10 chromosome‐specific probes2002 · 38 citations
  4. 4Prevalence and prognostic significance of KIT mutations in pediatric patients with core binding factor AML enrolled on serial pediatric cooperative trials for de novo AML2010 · 187 citations
  5. 5Clinical impact and proposed application of molecular markers, genetic variants, and cytogenetic analysis in mast cell neoplasms: Status 20222022 · 42 citations