PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 19, 2026Case Reports in Infectious Diseases0 citationsOpen Access

Relapsing Nasal Septal Leishmaniasis: Lessons in Long‐Term Multidisciplinary Management Case Report

View Full Paper
EEEmily EhsanESEllie StaabKGKatie Geelan‐Hansen

Key Points

  • This case report aims to highlight the long-term management challenges and strategies for relapsing mucosal leishmaniasis.
  • Present a case of a 48-year-old male with previous cutaneous leishmaniasis and progressing nasal symptoms.
  • Treat initial symptoms with oral fluconazole, followed by miltefosine and multiple reconstructive surgeries.
  • Monitor the patient for 38 months before biopsy confirming relapse and treat with intravenous amphotericin B.
  • Miltefosine resolved initial symptoms, leading to surgeries with clinical improvement.
  • Recurrence of symptoms with biopsy confirmation of L. braziliensis 38 months later.
  • Intravenous amphotericin B resulted in further clinical improvement, emphasizing the need for long-term care.

Abstract

Introduction Mucosal leishmaniasis (ML) is a rare, destructive, and recurrent protozoal infection caused by Leishmania species, most commonly Leishmania braziliensis . ML can develop months to years after initial cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) and may lead to severe mucosal destruction if untreated. Case Presentation We present a case of a 48‐year‐old healthy male from Venezuela with prior CL treated with intravenous meglumine antimoniate who subsequently developed progressive nasal symptoms consistent with ML. Initial therapy with oral fluconazole was ineffective, but treatment with miltefosine led to symptom resolution. The patient underwent four‐staged reconstructive surgeries with ENT. Thirty‐eight months later, the patient developed recurrent symptoms, and biopsy confirmed infection with L. braziliensis . He was subsequently treated with intravenous amphotericin B, which led to clinical improvement. Discussion This case highlights the relapsing nature of ML, its potential for extensive mucosal damage, and the importance of a structured, long‐term care plan. This case in particular is unique given the extended delay before recurrence following miltefosine therapy. The high recurrence rate of L. braziliensis infections underscores the importance of vigilant long‐term follow‐up and consideration of systemic therapy. Multidisciplinary management is often necessary to optimize outcomes. Conclusion Early recognition of ML, timely systemic therapy, structured multidisciplinary care, and adherence to a long‐term surveillance plan are critical to prevent mucosal destruction and manage relapses effectively. Extended surveillance may be warranted to detect late relapses in patients treated with newer or more effective agents.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ehsan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a34dfa365a5b0777af2eae1https://doi.org/10.1155/crdi/1784961
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper