PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 19, 2026International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching0 citations

Blood flow restriction does not confer additional benefits to acute countermovement jump responses following bodyweight squat–induced post-activation performance enhancement in female recreational athletes

View Full Paper
YMYücel MakaracıEGEmine GüçBKBatuhan Karaduman

Key Result

Adding blood flow restriction to a bodyweight squat protocol did not significantly improve countermovement jump height compared to the squat protocol alone (condition × time interaction p=0.853).

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess whether blood flow restriction (BFR) enhances post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) responses in countermovement jump performance.
  • Randomized crossover design with 20 female participants (age: 19.1 ± 1.1 years)
  • Interventions included bodyweight squats with and without BFR (KAATSU C4 device)
  • CMJ assessments were conducted at baseline and at 3, 6, and 9 minutes post-exercise.
  • Jump height showed a significant main effect of time (p = .001)
  • Condition had a significant main effect (p = .020)
  • No significant condition × time interaction (p = .853) and no significant changes in relative maximal power or rate of force development (p > .05).

Study Design

Type

RCT (n=20)

Randomization

Randomized crossover

Structured PICO

Does adding blood flow restriction to a bodyweight squat protocol improve countermovement jump performance in female recreational athletes?

P
Population
20 healthy female recreational athletes (mean age 19.1 years) completing a randomized crossover study of bodyweight squats with or without blood flow restriction.
I
Intervention
Blood flow restriction (KAATSU C4 device, cycle mode) combined with a bodyweight squat protocol (3 × 10 repetitions)
C
Comparator
Bodyweight squat protocol (3 × 10 repetitions) without blood flow restriction
O
Outcome
Countermovement jump (CMJ) performance (jump height, relative maximal power, and rate of force development) at baseline and at 3, 6, and 9 min post-exercisesurrogate

Adding blood flow restriction to a bodyweight squat protocol does not provide additional benefits to acute countermovement jump performance in female recreational athletes.

Main Result

p-value: p=0.853

Abstract

Post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) is widely used to acutely improve neuromuscular performance; however, the effectiveness of combining blood flow restriction (BFR) with bodyweight squat exercise remains unclear. This study aimed to determine whether adding BFR to a bodyweight squat–based conditioning protocol enhances PAPE responses in countermovement jump (CMJ) performance in female recreational athletes. Twenty healthy female participants (age: 19.1 ± 1.1 years) completed a randomized crossover design involving BFR (KAATSU C4 device, cycle mode) and non-BFR conditions. Both conditions consisted of a bodyweight squat protocol (3 × 10 repetitions), followed by CMJ assessments at baseline and at 3, 6, and 9 min post-exercise. Jump height, relative maximal power (RMP), and rate of force development (RFD) were measured using a force plate. A significant main effect of time was observed for jump height (p = .001), and a significant main effect of condition was also identified (p = .020). However, no significant condition × time interaction was found (p = .853). No significant effects were observed for RMP or RFD (p > .05). These findings suggest that the bodyweight squat protocol alone was sufficient to elicit a PAPE response, whereas the addition of BFR did not provide meaningful improvements in CMJ performance. Practitioners aiming to acutely enhance jumping performance may therefore prioritize the bodyweight squat protocol used in this study without the addition of BFR.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Makaracı et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Healthy female recreational athletes (n=20). Blood flow restriction (BFR) vs. Non-BFR condition was evaluated on Countermovement jump (CMJ) performance (jump height, relative maximal power, and rate of force development) (p=0.853). Adding blood flow restriction to a bodyweight squat protocol did not significantly improve countermovement jump height compared to the squat protocol alone (condition × time interaction p=0.853).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a359850dd3be7785e70ed70https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541261459284
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper